Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy (Jul 2017)

No added diagnostic value of non-phosphorylated tau fraction (p-taurel) in CSF as a biomarker for differential dementia diagnosis

  • Joery Goossens,
  • Maria Bjerke,
  • Hanne Struyfs,
  • Ellis Niemantsverdriet,
  • Charisse Somers,
  • Tobi Van den Bossche,
  • Sara Van Mossevelde,
  • Bart De Vil,
  • Anne Sieben,
  • Jean-Jacques Martin,
  • Patrick Cras,
  • Johan Goeman,
  • Peter Paul De Deyn,
  • Christine Van Broeckhoven,
  • Julie van der Zee,
  • Sebastiaan Engelborghs

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-017-0275-5
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9, no. 1
pp. 1 – 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The Alzheimer’s disease (AD) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers Aβ1–42, t-tau, and p-tau181 overlap with other diseases. New tau modifications or epitopes, such as the non-phosphorylated tau fraction (p-taurel), may improve differential dementia diagnosis. The goal of this study is to investigate if p-taurel can improve the diagnostic performance of the AD CSF biomarker panel for differential dementia diagnosis. Methods The study population consisted of 45 AD, 45 frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), 45 dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and 21 Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) patients, and 20 cognitively healthy controls. A substantial subset of the patients was pathology-confirmed. CSF levels of Aβ1–42, t-tau, p-tau181, and p-taurel were determined with commercially available single-analyte enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses, and area under the curve (AUC) values were compared using DeLong tests. Results The diagnostic performance of single markers as well as biomarker ratios was determined for each pairwise comparison of different dementia groups and controls. The addition of p-taurel to the AD biomarker panel decreased its diagnostic performance when discriminating non-AD, FTLD, and DLB from AD. As a single marker, p-taurel increased the diagnostic performance for CJD. No significant difference was found in AUC values with the addition of p-taurel when differentiating between AD or non-AD dementias and controls. Conclusions The addition of p-taurel to the AD CSF biomarker panel failed to improve differentiation between AD and non-AD dementias.

Keywords