Patient Safety in Surgery (May 2022)

Safety and efficacy of manual vacuum aspiration under local anesthesia compared to general anesthesia in the surgical management of miscarriage: a retrospective cohort study

  • Toshiyuki Kakinuma,
  • Kaoru Kakinuma,
  • Ayaka Kaneko,
  • Masataka Kagimoto,
  • Yoshimasa Kawarai,
  • Motomasa Ihara,
  • Koyomi Saito,
  • Yoshio Matsuda,
  • Michitaka Ohwada,
  • Hirokazu Tanaka,
  • Nobuhiro Takeshima,
  • Kaoru Yanagida

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-022-00328-7
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 16, no. 1
pp. 1 – 5

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background In Japan, dilatation & curettage (D&C) has been performed under general anesthesia as a surgery for an early pregnancy miscarriage for a long time. In 2016, manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) under general anesthesia was introduced at our hospital and has been used as a surgical treatment for first-trimester pregnancy miscarriage, with its utility to date being reported here. In July 2018, our hospital introduced the MVA procedure under local anesthesia. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of MVA under general and local anesthesia in first-trimester pregnancy miscarriage surgery in Japanese women. Methods In this retrospective observational cohort study, we enrolled 322 pregnant women at less than 12 weeks of gestation, who underwent MVA surgery under local anesthesia (n = 166) or conventional general anesthesia (n = 156). The duration of surgery, blood loss volume, quantity of anesthesia, presence or absence of retained products of conception, and clinical complications were evaluated. In addition, the intraoperative pain and treatment satisfaction were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS). Results The duration of surgery was significantly shorter in the local anesthesia group. No significant differences were observed between both groups in terms of the blood loss volume and incidence of retained products of conception. In addition, no serious complications were observed in either group. No significant differences were noted between the two groups in the VAS scores for pain and treatment satisfaction. Conclusions In this retrospective study, the use of MVA under local anesthesia for early pregnancy miscarriage surgery was found to be equally safe and effective when performed under conventional general anesthesia. This technique allowed the achievement of appropriate pain control with excellent patient satisfaction.

Keywords