Antibiotics (Jan 2024)

Sequential versus Standard Triple Therapy for First-Line <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> Eradication: An Update

  • Olga P. Nyssen,
  • Belén Martínez,
  • Francis Mégraud,
  • Vincenzo Savarino,
  • Carlo A. Fallone,
  • Franco Bazzoli,
  • Javier P. Gisbert

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13020136
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 2
p. 136

Abstract

Read online

Background: non-bismuth sequential therapy (SEQ) was suggested as a first-line anti-Helicobacter pylori treatment alternative to standard triple therapy (STT). Methods: We conducted a systematic review with a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of 10-day SEQ vs. STT (of at least 7 days) using bibliographical searches up to July 2021, including treatment-naïve adult or children. The intention-to-treat (ITT) eradication rate and the risk difference (RD) were calculated. Results: Overall, 69 RCTs were evaluated, including 19,657 patients (9486 in SEQ; 10,171 in STT). Overall, SEQ was significantly more effective than STT (82% vs. 75%; RD 0.08; p I2 = 68%), and 38 studies did not demonstrate differences between therapies. Subgroup analyses suggested that patients with clarithromycin resistance only and all geographical areas but South America could benefit more from SEQ. Both therapies have evolved over the years, showing similar results when STT lasted 14 days; however, a tendency toward lower SEQ efficacy was noted from 2010 onwards. Conclusions: Prior to 2010, SEQ was significantly more effective than STT, notably when 7-day STT was prescribed. A tendency toward lower differences between SEQ and STT has been noted, especially when using 10-day STT. None of the therapies achieved an optimal efficacy and therefore cannot be recommended as a valid first-line H. pylori treatment.

Keywords