Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States
John R Giles
Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States
Javier Perez-Saez
Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States
Théophile Mande
Bureau d'Etudes Scientifiques et Techniques - Eau, Energie, Environnement (BEST-3E), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
Andrea Rinaldo
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile Edile ed Ambientale, Università di Padova, Padova, Italy; Laboratory of Ecohydrology, School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Simon Mutembo
Department of International Health, International Vaccine Access Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, United States; Macha Research Trust, Choma, Zambia
Elliot N Kabalo
Zambia Information and Communications Technology Authority, Lusaka, Zambia
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and the Princeton School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
Human mobility is a core component of human behavior and its quantification is critical for understanding its impact on infectious disease transmission, traffic forecasting, access to resources and care, intervention strategies, and migratory flows. When mobility data are limited, spatial interaction models have been widely used to estimate human travel, but have not been extensively validated in low- and middle-income settings. Geographic, sociodemographic, and infrastructure differences may impact the ability for models to capture these patterns, particularly in rural settings. Here, we analyzed mobility patterns inferred from mobile phone data in four Sub-Saharan African countries to investigate the ability for variants on gravity and radiation models to estimate travel. Adjusting the gravity model such that parameters were fit to different trip types, including travel between more or less populated areas and/or different regions, improved model fit in all four countries. This suggests that alternative models may be more useful in these settings and better able to capture the range of mobility patterns observed.