Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research (Apr 2024)

Proposal for a classification system of radiographic bone changes after cervical disc replacement

  • Armen Khachatryan,
  • Frank M. Phillips,
  • Todd H. Lanman,
  • Gunnar B. Andersson,
  • Joshua J. Jacobs,
  • Steven M. Kurtz

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-04679-y
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 19, no. 1
pp. 1 – 16

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The goal of this study is to propose a classification system with a common nomenclature for radiographic observations of periprosthetic bone changes following cTDR. Methods Aided by serial plain radiographs from recent cTDR cases (34 patients; 44 devices), a panel of experts assembled for the purpose of creating a classification system to aid in reproducibly and accurately identifying bony changes and assessing cTDR radiographic appearance. Subdividing the superior and inferior vertebral bodies into 3 equal sections, observed bone loss such as endplate rounding, cystic erosion adjacent to the endplate, and cystic erosion not adjacent to the endplate, is recorded. Determining if bone loss is progressive, based on serial radiographs, and estimating severity of bone loss (measured by the percentage of end plate involved) is recorded. Additional relevant bony changes and device observations include radiolucent lines, heterotopic ossification, vertebral body olisthesis, loss of core implant height, and presence of device migration, and subsidence. Results Serial radiographs from 19 patients (25 devices) implanted with a variety of cTDR designs were assessed by 6 investigators including clinicians and scientists experienced in cTDR or appendicular skeleton joint replacement. The overall agreement of assessments ranged from 49.9% (95% bootstrap confidence interval 45.1–73.1%) to 94.7% (95% CI 86.9–100.0%). There was reasonable agreement on the presence or absence of bone loss or radiolucencies (range: 58.4% (95% CI 51.5–82.7%) to 94.7% (95% CI 86.9–100.0%), as well as in the progression of radiolucent lines (82.9% (95% CI 74.4–96.5%)). Conclusions The novel classification system proposed demonstrated good concordance among experienced investigators in this field and represents a useful advancement for improving reporting in cTDR studies.

Keywords