Scientific Reports (Mar 2023)

Stress native T1 and native T2 mapping compared to myocardial perfusion reserve in long-term follow-up of severe Covid-19

  • Jannike Nickander,
  • Rebecka Steffen Johansson,
  • Klara Lodin,
  • Anton Wahrby,
  • Daniel Loewenstein,
  • Judith Bruchfeld,
  • Michael Runold,
  • Hui Xue,
  • Peter Kellman,
  • Henrik Engblom

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30989-y
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Severe Covid-19 may cause a cascade of cardiovascular complications beyond viral pneumonia. The severe inflammation may affect the microcirculation which can be assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging using quantitative perfusion mapping and calculation of myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR). Furthermore, native T1 and T2 mapping have previously been shown to identify changes in myocardial perfusion by the change in native T1 and T2 during adenosine stress. However, the relationship between native T1, native T2, ΔT1 and ΔT2 with myocardial perfusion and MPR during long-term follow-up in severe Covid-19 is currently unknown. Therefore, patients with severe Covid-19 (n = 37, median age 57 years, 24% females) underwent 1.5 T CMR median 292 days following discharge. Quantitative myocardial perfusion (ml/min/g), and native T1 and T2 maps were acquired during adenosine stress, and rest, respectively. Both native T1 (R2 = 0.35, p 0.05 for both). Native T1 and native T2 correlate with myocardial perfusion during adenosine stress, reflecting the coronary circulation in patients during long-term follow-up of severe Covid-19. Neither ΔT1 nor ΔT2 can be used to assess MPR in patients with severe Covid-19.