Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine (Jan 2022)

Periprocedural outcomes of protamine administration after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

  • Jakrin Kewcharoen,
  • Kuldeep Shah,
  • Rahul Bhardwaj,
  • Tahmeed Contractor,
  • Mohit K. Turagam,
  • Ravi Mandapati,
  • Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy,
  • Jalaj Garg

DOI
https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2301034
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
p. 034

Abstract

Read online

Background: Perioperative anticoagulation management with uninterrupted or minimally interrupted anticoagulation during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is thought to be critical to minimize thromboembolic complications. Protamine is often administered to neutralize the effects of heparin and expedite vascular hemostasis post-procedure. Objective: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness of protamine to expedite vascular hemostasis and ambulation in patients undergoing AF ablation. Methods: Electronic searches on PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, EBSCO, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases from the inception through August 7, 2021, were performed. The primary outcomes included—time to hemostasis (minutes) and time to ambulation (minutes). The secondary outcomes included - any vascular complications (excluding minor hematoma), minor hematoma, or cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). Results: A total of 5 eligible studies (3 retrospective cohort studies and two randomized trials) consisting of 1012 patients (515 patients received protamine group and 497 patients did not receive protamine group) were included in the meta-analysis. There was a significant reduction in time to ambulation [weighted mean difference (WMD) –176.6 minutes, 95% Confidence interval (CI) –266.9 to –86.3; p < 0.01] and time to hemostasis (WMD –13.72 minutes, 95% CI –22 to –5.4, p < 0.01) in the protamine group compared to the contrary. At a follow-up up to 3 months, there was no statistical difference between the two groups with regards to vascular complications (2.9% vs. 7.4%; Risk ratio (RR) 0.46 95% CI 0.17 to 1.24; p = 0.12), minor hematoma (2.1% vs. 5.8%; RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.2; p = 0.11) or CVA (0 vs. 0.3%; RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.08 to 4.98; p = 0.65). Conclusion: Protamine administration was associated with reduced time to ambulation (176 minutes reduction) and time to hemostasis (13 minutes reduction) without an increase in any adverse events.

Keywords