Predicting milk protein fractions using infrared spectroscopy and a gradient boosting machine for breeding purposes in Holstein cattle

Abstract

ABSTRACT: In recent years, increasing attention has been focused on the genetic evaluation of protein fractions in cow milk with the aim of improving milk quality and technological characteristics. In this context, advances in high-throughput phenotyping by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy offer the opportunity for large-scale, efficient measurement of novel traits that can be exploited in breeding programs as indicator traits. We took milk samples from 2,558 Holstein cows belonging to 38 herds in northern Italy, operating under different production systems. Fourier transform infrared spectra were collected on the same day as milk sampling and stored for subsequent analysis. Two sets of data (i.e., phenotypes and FTIR spectra) collected in 2 different years (2013 and 2019–2020) were compiled. The following traits were assessed using HPLC: true protein, major casein fractions [αS1-casein (CN), αS2-CN, β-CN, κ-CN, and glycosylated-κ-CN], and major whey proteins (β-lactoglobulin and α-lactalbumin), all of which were measured both in grams per liter (g/L) and proportion of total nitrogen (% N). The FTIR predictions were calculated using the gradient boosting machine technique and tested by 3 different cross-validation (CRV) methods. We used the following CRV scenarios: (1) random 10-fold, which randomly split the whole into 10-folds of equal size (9-folds for training and 1-fold for validation); (2) herd/date-out CRV, which assigned 80% of herd/date as the training set with independence of 20% of herd/date assigned as the validation set; (3) forward/backward CRV, which split the data set in training and validation set according with the year of milk sampling (FTIR and gold standard data assessed in 2013 or 2019–2020) using the “old” and “new” databases for training and validation, and vice-versa with independence among them; (4) the CRV for genetic parameters (CRV-gen), where animals without pedigree as assigned as a fixed training population and animals with pedigree information was split in 5-folds, in which 1-fold was assigned to the fixed training population, and 4-folds were assigned to the validation set (independent from the training set). The results (i.e., measures and predictions) of CRV-gen were used to infer the genetic parameters for gold standard laboratory measurements (i.e., proteins assessed with HPLC) and FTIR-based predictions considering the CRV-gen scenario from a bi-trait animal model using single-step genomic BLUP. We found that the prediction accuracies of the gradient boosting machine equations differed according to the way in which the proteins were expressed, achieving higher accuracy when expressed in g/L than when expressed as % N in all CRV scenarios. Concerning the reproducibility of the equations over the different years, the results showed no relevant differences in predictive ability between using “old” data as the training set and “new” data as the validation set and vice-versa. Comparing the additive genetic variance estimates for milk protein fractions between the FTIR predicted and HPLC measures, we found reductions of −19.7% for milk protein fractions expressed in g/L, and −21.19% expressed as % N. Although we found reductions in the heritability estimates, they were small, with values ranging from −1.9 to −7.25% for g/L, and −1.6 to −7.9% for % N. The posterior distributions of the additive genetic correlations (ra) between the FTIR predictions and the laboratory measurements were generally high (>0.8), even when the milk protein fractions were expressed as % N. Our results show the potential of using FTIR predictions in breeding programs as indicator traits for the selection of animals to enhance milk protein fraction contents. We expect acceptable responses to selection due to the high genetic correlations between HPLC measurements and FTIR predictions.

Keywords

• cross-validation strategies
• genetic parameters
• milk protein fraction prediction
• prediction accuracy