Brazilian Oral Research (Jan 2015)

Effects of various irrigation/aspiration protocols on cleaning of flattened root canals

  • Diego Henrique da Silva MENDONÇA,
  • Vivian COLUCCI,
  • Fuad Jacob Abi RACHED-JUNIOR,
  • Carlos Eduardo Saraiva MIRANDA,
  • Yara Teresinha Corrêa SILVA-SOUSA,
  • Silvio Rocha Corrêa da SILVA

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015.vol29.0082
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 29, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

This study aimed to evaluate, by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the cleaning of flattened root canals, varying irrigation/aspiration protocols during biomechanical preparation. Thirdy human mandibular incisors were distributed into three groups (n = 10) according to the aspiration/irrigation protocols: conventional, conventional + brush, and apical negative pressure irrigation. Irrigation procedure was performed with 5 mL of 1% NaOCl at each change of instrument; final irrigation was conducted with 17% EDTA for 5 min. After biomechanical preparation, the roots were sectioned and prepared for SEM analysis. The images obtained were evaluated under 35× and 1,000× magnification by three calibrated examiners, following a double-blind design. All data were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s post hoctests (α = 0.05). Canals wherein the conventional method and apical negative pressure irrigation were employed revealed less debris, statistically different from the conventional + brush group (p 0.05), both for the presence of debris and smear layer. In conclusion, although none of the studied irrigation/aspiration protocols have completely cleaned flattened root canals, apical negative pressure irrigation was more effective in smear layer removal, whereas the conventional + brush protocol was the least effective in removing the debris and smear layer.

Keywords