Drug Design, Development and Therapy (Sep 2020)
Comparison of GnRH-a Prolonged Protocol and Short GnRH-a Long Protocol in Patients with Thin Endometrium for Assisted Reproduction: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Abstract
Jianyuan Song,1 Cuicui Duan,2 Wangyu Cai,1 Wei Wu,1 Houyi Lv,2 Jian Xu1 1The Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, Zhejiang 322000, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Assisted Reproduction, Women’s Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310006, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Jian XuThe Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, Zhejiang 322000, People’s Republic of ChinaEmail [email protected]: Gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) is widely used for pituitary down-regulation and recruiting more follicles in assisted reproduction. However, no information is available on its value for patients with thin endometrial thickness.Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 302 patients with endometrium < 8 mm undergoing fresh embryo transfer at a fertility center of a university hospital from January 2016 and December 2018. In 148 cycles of the GnRH-a prolonged protocol, one depot of 3.75 mg GnRH-a was injected on day 2 of the menstrual cycle, while in 154 cycles of the short GnRH-a long protocol, 0.1 mg of GnRH-a was injected daily from the mid-luteal phase. The live birth rate and clinical pregnancy rate were compared between the two groups. Other outcome measures included the implantation rate, miscarriage rate, and characteristics of stimulation procedures.Results: Live birth rates and clinical pregnancy rates were significantly higher in the GnRH-a prolonged protocol group than in the other group (36.5% vs 20.8%, P=0.002; 43.9% vs 28.2%, P=0.006, respectively). The live birth rate was significantly increased in the prolonged protocol group (crude OR: 2.190, 95% CI: 1.311, 3.660; adjusted OR: 2.458, 95% CI: 1.430, 4.224) compared with that in the reference group. The implantation rate of the former group was also significantly higher than that of the latter group (35.4% vs 15.9%, P=0.000). There was no significant difference in miscarriage rates between the two protocols. In terms of stimulation procedures, the GnRH-a prolonged protocol group required significantly higher Gn time (10.9 vs 9.5 days, P=0.000) and Gn consumption (2625.0 vs 2047.5 IU, P=0.000) than the short GnRH-a long protocol group.Conclusion: The GnRH-a prolonged protocol in fresh embryo transfer cycles yielded better clinical outcomes of patients with thin endometrium than the short GnRH-a long protocol.Keywords: ovarian stimulation, GnRH-a prolonged protocol, thin endometrium, IVF, COH
