Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (Mar 2022)

Feasibility and Safety of Very-Low Contrast Combined Ringer's Solution in Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging

  • Tao Chen,
  • Tao Chen,
  • Huai Yu,
  • Huai Yu,
  • Lijia Ma,
  • Lijia Ma,
  • Chao Fang,
  • Chao Fang,
  • Haibo Jia,
  • Haibo Jia,
  • Huimin Liu,
  • Huimin Liu,
  • Maoen Xu,
  • Maoen Xu,
  • Donghui Zhang,
  • Donghui Zhang,
  • Guang Yang,
  • Guang Yang,
  • Shuangyin Zhang,
  • Shuangyin Zhang,
  • Jincheng Han,
  • Jincheng Han,
  • Guo Wei,
  • Guo Wei,
  • Yanchao Liu,
  • Yanchao Liu,
  • Jingbo Hou,
  • Jingbo Hou,
  • Bo Yu,
  • Bo Yu

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.844114
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundOptical coherence tomography (OCT) is an important modality used in coronary intervention. However, OCT requires a high amount of contrast media, limiting its extensive application in clinical practice. This study compared OCT images of coronary lesions obtained using contrast media and very-low contrast combined Ringer's solution (VLCCR) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).MethodsThirty ACS patients with a total of 36 native lesions and stenoses from 70 to 90% were included in this study. Two kinds of flushing media (a contrast medium and VLCCR) were used in succession in a random order for OCT image pullback of each lesion. VLCCR method is using low volume contrast (4–5 ml) injected into the guiding catheter previously combination with injector infused Ringer's solution instead of pure contrast medium. The safety of procedure was evaluated by recording the patients ‘symptoms, changes of ECG, blood pressure and heart rate. OCT images were analyzed to determine the image clarity. Lumen area and diameter were also measured and the consistency between the two media was compared.ResultsOCT procedure using either contrast or VLCCR did not show any peri-procedural adverse events. There was no difference in changes of blood pressure and heart rate in both procedures, however, VLCCR procedure showed less procedure-related symptoms and ECG changes. We found that the percentage of clear image frame was equivalent between the contrast and VLCCR media (98.0 vs. 96.9%, P = 0.90). We also observed a high degree of similarity between the different lesion phenotypes of ACS for both media. There was a linear correlation of the phenotypes obtained with these two different methods, and a significant correlation was observed between measurements obtained with contrast and VLCCR without correction for the refractive index of VLCCR (correlation coefficients ranged between 0.829 and 0.948).ConclusionsOCT imaging using VLCCR for blood clearance is feasible and safe and provides similar imaging quality compared to OCT imaging obtained using radiographic contrast media for ACS patients.

Keywords