Cancers (Aug 2023)

Selecting Optimal Proton Pencil Beam Scanning Plan Parameters to Reduce Dose Discrepancy between Discrete Spot Plan and Continuous Scanning: A Proof-of-Concept Study

  • Xiaoying Liang,
  • Chris J. Beltran,
  • Chunbo Liu,
  • Chunjoo Park,
  • Bo Lu,
  • Sridhar Yaddanapudi,
  • Jun Tan,
  • Keith M. Furutani

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15164084
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 16
p. 4084

Abstract

Read online

Pencil beam scanning delivered with continuous scanning has several advantages over conventional discrete spot scanning. Such advantages include improved beam delivery efficiency and reduced beam delivery time. However, a move dose is delivered between consecutive spots with continuous scanning, and current treatment planning systems do not take this into account. Therefore, continuous scanning and discrete spot plans have an inherent dose discrepancy. Using the operating parameters of the state-of-the-art particle therapy system, we conducted a proof-of-concept study in which we systematically generated 28 plans for cubic targets with different combinations of plan parameters and simulated the dose discrepancies between continuous scanning and a planned one. A nomograph to guide the selection of plan parameters was developed to reduce the dose discrepancy. The effectiveness of the nomograph was evaluated with two clinical cases (one prostate and one liver). Plans with parameters guided by the nomograph decreased dose discrepancy than those used standard plan parameters. Specifically, the 2%/2 mm gamma passing rate increased from 96.3% to 100% for the prostate case and from 97.8% to 99.7% for the liver case. The CTV DVH root mean square error decreased from 2.2% to 0.2% for the prostate case and from 1.8% to 0.9% for the liver case. The decreased dose discrepancy may allow the relaxing of the delivery constraint for some cases, leading to greater benefits in continuous scanning. Further investigation is warranted.

Keywords