Journal of Biomedical Semantics (Sep 2017)

Ontology-based specification, identification and analysis of perioperative risks

  • Alexandr Uciteli,
  • Juliane Neumann,
  • Kais Tahar,
  • Kutaiba Saleh,
  • Stephan Stucke,
  • Sebastian Faulbrück-Röhr,
  • André Kaeding,
  • Martin Specht,
  • Tobias Schmidt,
  • Thomas Neumuth,
  • Andreas Besting,
  • Dominik Stegemann,
  • Frank Portheine,
  • Heinrich Herre

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13326-017-0147-8
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8, no. 1
pp. 1 – 14

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Medical personnel in hospitals often works under great physical and mental strain. In medical decision-making, errors can never be completely ruled out. Several studies have shown that between 50 and 60% of adverse events could have been avoided through better organization, more attention or more effective security procedures. Critical situations especially arise during interdisciplinary collaboration and the use of complex medical technology, for example during surgical interventions and in perioperative settings (the period of time before, during and after surgical intervention). Methods In this paper, we present an ontology and an ontology-based software system, which can identify risks across medical processes and supports the avoidance of errors in particular in the perioperative setting. We developed a practicable definition of the risk notion, which is easily understandable by the medical staff and is usable for the software tools. Based on this definition, we developed a Risk Identification Ontology (RIO) and used it for the specification and the identification of perioperative risks. Results An agent system was developed, which gathers risk-relevant data during the whole perioperative treatment process from various sources and provides it for risk identification and analysis in a centralized fashion. The results of such an analysis are provided to the medical personnel in form of context-sensitive hints and alerts. For the identification of the ontologically specified risks, we developed an ontology-based software module, called Ontology-based Risk Detector (OntoRiDe). Conclusions About 20 risks relating to cochlear implantation (CI) have already been implemented. Comprehensive testing has indicated the correctness of the data acquisition, risk identification and analysis components, as well as the web-based visualization of results.

Keywords