Tuberculosis Research and Treatment (Jan 2018)

Smear Microscopy for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Eastern Sudan

  • Yassir A. Shuaib,
  • Eltahir A. G. Khalil,
  • Ulrich E. Schaible,
  • Lothar H. Wieler,
  • Mohammed A. M. Bakheit,
  • Saad E. Mohamed-Noor,
  • Mohamed A. Abdalla,
  • Susanne Homolka,
  • Sönke Andres,
  • Doris Hillemann,
  • Knut Lonnroth,
  • Elvira Richter,
  • Stefan Niemann,
  • Katharina Kranzer

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8038137
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2018

Abstract

Read online

Background. In Sudan, tuberculosis diagnosis largely relies on clinical symptoms and smear microscopy as in many other low- and middle-income countries. The aim of this study was to investigate the positive predictive value of a positive sputum smear in patients investigated for pulmonary tuberculosis in Eastern Sudan. Methods. Two sputum samples from patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of tuberculosis were investigated using direct Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) staining and light microscopy between June to October 2014 and January to July 2016. If one of the samples was smear positive, both samples were pooled, stored at −20°C, and sent to the National Reference Laboratory (NRL), Germany. Following decontamination, samples underwent repeat microscopy and culture. Culture negative/contaminated samples were investigated using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results. A total of 383 samples were investigated. Repeat microscopy categorized 123 (32.1%) as negative, among which 31 were culture positive. This increased to 80 when PCR and culture results were considered together. A total of 196 samples were culture positive, of which 171 (87.3%), 14 (7.1%), and 11 (5.6%) were M. tuberculosis, M. intracellulare, and mixed species. Overall, 15.6% (57/365) of the samples had no evidence of M. tuberculosis, resulting in a positive predictive value of 84.4%. Conclusions. There was a discordance between the results of smear microscopy performed at local laboratories in the Sudan and at the NRL, Germany; besides, a considerable number of samples had no evidence of M. tuberculosis. Improved quality control for smear microscopy and more specific diagnostics are crucial to avoid possible overtreatment.