World Allergy Organization Journal (Jan 2010)

Section 1. EPR-3 versus GINA 2008 Guidelines - Asthma Control and Step 3 Care

  • Jean Bousquet, MD,
  • William W. Busse, MD

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3, no. 2
pp. 16 – 22

Abstract

Read online

Recent updates to asthma guidelines from the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) and the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (Expert Panel Report 3, EPR-3) share many similarities, reflecting a focus on asthma control based on clinical manifestations of disease and responsiveness to therapy. Both documents build upon the recommendations of former guidelines utilizing evidence-based review of the published literature to revise algorithms for practice. A major difference between the 2 reports is the preferred treatment at Step 3. The GINA guidelines recommend a combination of low-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) plus long-acting β-agonist (LABA), whereas the EPR-3 advises either monotherapy with medium-dose ICS or the low-dose ICS + LABA combination. Both approaches are supported by clinical experience and Level A evidence. The option of personalized therapy is a point of discussion for future guidelines. Keywords: EPR-3, GINA, asthma, guidelines