BMC Ophthalmology (Dec 2022)

Multidisciplinary ocular and periocular cancers meetings: implementation in a tertiary referral center and analysis over a 12-months period

  • Gustavo Savino,
  • Fabrizio Piccinni,
  • Monica Maria Pagliara,
  • Maria Grazia Sammarco,
  • Carmela Grazia Caputo,
  • Alessandro Moro,
  • Giorgio Barbera,
  • Luca Tagliaferri,
  • Bruno Fionda,
  • Giovanni Schinzari,
  • Ernesto Rossi,
  • Luca Zagaria,
  • Ketty Peris,
  • Alessandro Di Stefani,
  • Teresa Musarra,
  • Luca Ausili Cefaro,
  • Matia Martucci,
  • Maria Antonietta Blasi

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02694-3
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 22, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Purpose The complexity of multimodal approaches in cancer management has lately led to the establishment of multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTBs) to define targeted, patient-centered treatment strategies. However, few data are available regarding the application of this approach in Ocular Oncology. Hereby, the Authors analyze the implementation and outcomes of a trained MDTB in a tertiary ocular oncology referral center. Methods A retrospective descriptive analysis of MDTB meetings discussing patients with ocular and periocular cancers, over a 12-months period, was carried out. Data were grouped by main site involved, topics discussed and final clinical decisions therefore taken. Meetings were held by a constant ‘Core team’ or – when required – by a broader ‘Extended team’. Results During the observational period 86 cases were discussed. In 27 patients ocular surface tissues were involved (31%), in 25 patients orbital tissues (29%), in 22 patients eyelids (26%), and in 12 patients intraocular tissues (14%). In 13 cases (15%) naïve or referred new patients, in 34 cases (40%) imaging or histopathologic reports and in 39 cases (45%) treatment plans were discussed. Regarding final decisions, a treatment plan was scheduled in 47 cases (55%) and a diagnostic ascertainment was required in 27 patients (31%); locally advanced and/or systemic diseases were referred or teamed up with other specialists in 12 cases (14%). Conclusions Ocular Oncology multidisciplinary team, by sharing expertise of different specialists, ensures a comprehensive evaluation of patients improving the accuracy of diagnosis and staging upon which planning a proper treatment. Further studies are needed to assess if this approach may also improve the outcomes and prognosis of patients.

Keywords