npj Precision Oncology (Jul 2023)

Deep learning predicts patients outcome and mutations from digitized histology slides in gastrointestinal stromal tumor

  • Yu Fu,
  • Marie Karanian,
  • Raul Perret,
  • Axel Camara,
  • François Le Loarer,
  • Myriam Jean-Denis,
  • Isabelle Hostein,
  • Audrey Michot,
  • Françoise Ducimetiere,
  • Antoine Giraud,
  • Jean-Baptiste Courreges,
  • Kevin Courtet,
  • Yech’an Laizet,
  • Etienne Bendjebbar,
  • Jean Ogier Du Terrail,
  • Benoit Schmauch,
  • Charles Maussion,
  • Jean-Yves Blay,
  • Antoine Italiano,
  • Jean-Michel Coindre

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-023-00421-9
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 7, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Risk assessment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) according to the AFIP/Miettinen classification and mutational profiling are major tools for patient management. However, the AFIP/Miettinen classification depends heavily on mitotic counts, which is laborious and sometimes inconsistent between pathologists. It has also been shown to be imperfect in stratifying patients. Molecular testing is costly and time-consuming, therefore, not systematically performed in all countries. New methods to improve risk and molecular predictions are hence crucial to improve the tailoring of adjuvant therapy. We have built deep learning (DL) models on digitized HES-stained whole slide images (WSI) to predict patients’ outcome and mutations. Models were trained with a cohort of 1233 GIST and validated on an independent cohort of 286 GIST. DL models yielded comparable results to the Miettinen classification for relapse-free-survival prediction in localized GIST without adjuvant Imatinib (C-index=0.83 in cross-validation and 0.72 for independent testing). DL splitted Miettinen intermediate risk GIST into high/low-risk groups (p value = 0.002 in the training set and p value = 0.29 in the testing set). DL models achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.81, 0.91, and 0.71 for predicting mutations in KIT, PDGFRA and wild type, respectively, in cross-validation and 0.76, 0.90, and 0.55 in independent testing. Notably, PDGFRA exon18 D842V mutation, which is resistant to Imatinib, was predicted with an AUC of 0.87 and 0.90 in cross-validation and independent testing, respectively. Additionally, novel histological criteria predictive of patients’ outcome and mutations were identified by reviewing the tiles selected by the models. As a proof of concept, our study showed the possibility of implementing DL with digitized WSI and may represent a reproducible way to improve tailoring therapy and precision medicine for patients with GIST.