Current Therapeutic Research (Jan 2024)

Efficacy and Safety of Triple Therapy of Telmisartan/Amlodipine/Rosuvastatin in Patients with Dyslipidemia and Hypertension: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

  • Sungjoon Park, MD,
  • Doyeon Hwang, MD,
  • Jeehoon Kang, MD,
  • Jung-Kyu Han, MD,
  • Han-Mo Yang, MD,
  • Kyung Woo Park, MD,
  • Hyun-Jae Kang, MD,
  • Bon-Kwon Koo, MD,
  • Jin-Man Cho, MD,
  • Byung-Ryul Cho, MD,
  • Sung Gyun Ahn, MD,
  • Seok-Min Kang, MD,
  • Jung-Hoon Sung, MD,
  • Ung Kim, MD,
  • Namho Lee, MD,
  • Hyo-Soo Kim, MD

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 100
p. 100735

Abstract

Read online

ABSTRACT: Background: Hypertension and dyslipidemia significantly contribute to cardiovascular disease development. Their coexistence poses challenges in managing multiple medications, influencing treatment adherence. Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a combined treatment approach using a fixed-dose combination therapy. Methods: This multicenter, 8-week, randomized, double-blind, Phase IV trial was named Telmisartan/Amlodipine/Rosuvastatin from Samjin Pharmaceuticals and evaluated the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combination treatment in patients with essential hypertension and dyslipidemia. They were randomly assigned to 2 fixed-dose combination therapy groups, telmisartan 40 mg/amlodipine 5 mg/rosuvastatin 10 mg (TEL/ALD/RSV) or amlodipine 5 mg/atorvastatin 10 mg (ALD/ATV) after washout/run-in period. The primary outcomes were the change in mean sitting systolic blood pressure and the percentage change of LDL-C after 8 weeks of medical treatment. Adverse drug reactions and events were assessed. Results: Of a total of 304 patients who underwent screening, 252 were randomized to the TEL/ALD/RSV group (125 patients) and the ALD/ATV group (127 patients). The mean (SD) ages of the TEL/ALD/RSV group and the ALD/ATV group were 67.4 (11.3) and 68.2 (10.6) years, respectively (P = 0.563). The least-squares mean (SE) in mean sitting systolic blood pressure changes between the 2 groups were –16.27 (0.93) mm Hg in the TEL/ALD/RSV group, –6.85 (0.92) mm Hg in the ALD/ATV group (LSM difference = –9.42 mm Hg; 95% CI, –11.99 to –6.84; P < .001). For LDL-C level changes, a significant difference was noted between the 2 groups: –50.03% (1.18%) in the TEL/ALD/RSV group, –39.60% (1.17%) in the ALD/ATV group (LSM difference = –10.43%; 95% CI, –13.70 to –7.16; P < .001). No severe adverse events were observed. Conclusions: TEL/ALD/RSV proved to be more efficient than ALD/ATV in lowering blood pressure and reducing LDL-C levels among patients with hypertension and dyslipidemia, with no notable safety concerns. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2024; XX:XXX–XXX). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03860220.

Keywords