Diagnostics (Oct 2023)

Diagnostic Superiority of Dual-Time Point [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT to Differentiate Malignant from Benign Soft Tissue Tumors

  • Philippe d’Abadie,
  • Olivier Gheysens,
  • Renaud Lhommel,
  • François Jamar,
  • Thomas Kirchgesner,
  • Filomena Mazzeo,
  • Laurent Coubeau,
  • Halil Yildiz,
  • An-Katrien De Roo,
  • Thomas Schubert

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13203202
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 13, no. 20
p. 3202

Abstract

Read online

[18F]FDG PET/CT is used in the workup of indeterminate soft tissue tumors (STTs) but lacks accuracy in the detection of malignant STTs. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether dual-time point [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging (DTPI) can be useful in this indication. In this prospective study, [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging was performed 1 h (t1) and 3 h (t2) after injection. Tumor uptake (SUVmax) was calculated at each time point to define a retention index (RI) corresponding to the variation between t1 and t2 (%). Sixty-eight patients were included, representing 20 benign and 48 malignant tumors (including 40 sarcomas). The RI was significantly higher in malignant STTs than in benign STTs (median: +21.8% vs. −2%, p 14.3% predicted STT malignancy with a specificity (Sp) of 90% and a sensitivity (Se) of 69%. An SUVmaxt1 of >4.5 was less accurate with an Sp of 80% and an Se of 60%. In a subgroup of tumors with at least mild [18F]FDG uptake (SUVmax ≥ 3; n = 46), the RI significantly outperformed the diagnostic accuracy of SUVmax (AUC: 0.88 vs. 0.68, p = 0.01). DTPI identifies malignant STT tumors with high specificity and outperforms the diagnostic accuracy of standard PET/CT.

Keywords