Neuropsychopharmacology Reports (Jun 2021)
Functional connectivity between the amygdala and subgenual cingulate gyrus predicts the antidepressant effects of ketamine in patients with treatment‐resistant depression
Abstract
Abstract Aim Approximately one‐third of patients with major depressive disorder develop treatment‐resistant depression. One‐third of patients with treatment‐resistant depression demonstrate resistance to ketamine, which is a novel antidepressant effective for this disorder. The objective of this study was to examine the utility of resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of treatment response to ketamine in treatment‐resistant depression. Methods An exploratory seed‐based resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging analysis was performed to examine baseline resting‐state functional connectivity differences between ketamine responders and nonresponders before treatment with multiple intravenous ketamine infusions. Results Fifteen patients with treatment‐resistant depression received multiple intravenous subanesthetic (0.5 mg/kg/40 minutes) ketamine infusions, and nine were identified as responders. The exploratory resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging analysis identified a cluster of significant baseline resting‐state functional connectivity differences associating ketamine response between the amygdala and subgenual anterior cingulate gyrus in the right hemisphere. Using anatomical region of interest analysis of the resting‐state functional connectivity, ketamine response was predicted with 88.9% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The resting‐state functional connectivity of significant group differences between responders and nonresponders retained throughout the treatment were considered a trait‐like feature of heterogeneity in treatment‐resistant depression. Conclusion This study suggests the possible clinical utility of resting‐state functional magnetic resonance imaging for predicting the antidepressant effects of ketamine in treatment‐resistant depression patients and implicated resting‐state functional connectivity alterations to determine the trait‐like pathophysiology underlying treatment response heterogeneity in treatment‐resistant depression.
Keywords