Cancers (Oct 2023)

Only 32.3% of Breast Cancer Families with Pathogenic Variants in Cancer Genes Utilized Cascade Genetic Testing

  • Konstantinos Agiannitopoulos,
  • Kevisa Potska,
  • Anastasia Katseli,
  • Christina Ntogka,
  • Georgios N. Tsaousis,
  • Georgia Pepe,
  • Dimitra Bouzarelou,
  • Nikolaos Tsoulos,
  • Athanasios Papathanasiou,
  • Dimitrios Ziogas,
  • Vassileios Venizelos,
  • Christos Markopoulos,
  • Rodoniki Iosifidou,
  • Sofia Karageorgopoulou,
  • Stylianos Giassas,
  • Ioannis Natsiopoulos,
  • Konstantinos Papazisis,
  • Maria Vasilaki-Antonatou,
  • Amanta Psyrri,
  • Anna Koumarianou,
  • Dimitrios Matthaios,
  • Eleni Zairi,
  • Alexandru Blidaru,
  • Eugeniu Banu,
  • Dan Corneliu Jinga,
  • Şahin Laçin,
  • Mustafa Özdoğan,
  • Eirini Papadopoulou,
  • George Nasioulas

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15215218
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 15, no. 21
p. 5218

Abstract

Read online

Background: Hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes are responsible for approximately 5–10% of all diagnosed cancer cases. In order to identify individuals at risk in a cost-efficient manner, family members of individuals carrying pathogenic alterations are tested only for the specific variant that was identified in their carrier relative. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical use and implementation of cascade family testing (CFT) in families of breast cancer patients with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PVs/LPVs) in cancer-related predisposition genes. Methods: Germline sequencing was carried out with NGS technology using a 52-gene panel, and cascade testing was performed by Sanger sequencing or MLPA. Results: In a cohort of 1785 breast cancer patients (families), 20.3% were found to have PVs/LPVs. Specifically, 52.2%, 25.1%, and 22.7% of patients had positive findings in high-, intermediate-, and low-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility genes, respectively. Although CFT was recommended to all families, only 117 families (32.3%) agreed to proceed with genetic testing. Among the first-degree relatives who underwent CFT, 70.3% were female, and 108 of 121 (89.3%) were cancer free. Additionally, 42.7%, 36.7%, and 20.6% were offspring, siblings, and parents of the subject, respectively. Our data suggest that CFT was mostly undertaken (104/117, 88.8%) in families with positive findings in high-risk genes. Conclusions: Cascade family testing can be a powerful tool for primary cancer prevention by identifying at-risk family members. It is of utmost importance to implement genetic counseling approaches leading to increased awareness and communication of genetic testing results.

Keywords