Clinical practice guideline recommendations to improve the mental health of adult trauma patients: protocol for a systematic review
Henry Thomas Stelfox,
Mélanie Bérubé,
Helen-Maria Vasiliadis,
Naisan Garraway,
Matthew Menear,
Juanita Haagsma,
Christine Genest,
Meaghan O'Donnell,
Alexandra Lapierre,
Nori Bradley,
Valerie Turcotte,
Michel Perreault,
Léonie Archambault,
Hélène Provencher,
Marc-Aurèle Gagnon,
Laurence Bourque,
Amal Khalfi,
William Panenka
Affiliations
Henry Thomas Stelfox
Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Mélanie Bérubé
Population Health and Optimal Practices Research Unit Research Unit (Trauma–Emergency–Critical Care Medicine), CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, Quebec, Canada
Helen-Maria Vasiliadis
University of Sherbrooke, Longueil, Quebec, Canada
Naisan Garraway
Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Matthew Menear
Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec, Canada
Juanita Haagsma
Faculty of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Christine Genest
Centre de recherche de l`Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
Meaghan O'Donnell
Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Alexandra Lapierre
Population Health and Optimal Practices Research Unit Research Unit (Trauma–Emergency–Critical Care Medicine), CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, Quebec, Canada
Nori Bradley
University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Valerie Turcotte
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec, Canada
Michel Perreault
Institut universitaire en santé mentale Douglas, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
Léonie Archambault
Institut universitaire en santé mentale Douglas, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
Hélène Provencher
Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec, Canada
Marc-Aurèle Gagnon
Population Health and Optimal Practices Research Unit Research Unit (Trauma–Emergency–Critical Care Medicine), CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, Quebec, Canada
Laurence Bourque
Population Health and Optimal Practices Research Unit Research Unit (Trauma–Emergency–Critical Care Medicine), CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Centre, Québec, Quebec, Canada
Amal Khalfi
Faculty of Nursing, Université Laval, Québec City, Quebec, Canada
William Panenka
Department of Psychiatry, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Introduction Mental disorders are common in adult patients with traumatic injuries. To limit the burden of poor psychological well-being in this population, recognised authorities have issued recommendations through clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). However, the uptake of evidence-based recommendations to improve the mental health of trauma patients has been low until recently. This may be explained by the complexity of optimising mental health practices and interpretating CGPs scope and quality. Our aim is to systematically review CPG mental health recommendations in the context of trauma care and appraise their quality.Methods and analysis We will identify CPG through a search strategy applied to Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases, as well as guidelines repositories and websites of trauma associations. We will target CPGs on adult and acute trauma populations including at least one recommendation on any prevention, screening, assessment, intervention, patient and family engagement, referral or follow-up procedure related to mental health endorsed by recognised organisations in high-income countries. No language limitations will be applied, and we will limit the search to the last 15 years. Pairs of reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts, full texts, and carry out data extraction and quality assessment of CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II. We will synthesise the evidence on recommendations for CPGs rated as moderate or high quality using a matrix based on the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation quality of evidence, strength of recommendation, health and social determinants and whether recommendations were made using a population-based approach.Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required, as we will conduct secondary analysis of published data. The results will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal, at international and national scientific meetings. Accessible summary will be distributed to interested parties through professional, healthcare quality and persons with lived experience associations.PROSPERO registration number (ID454728).