BMC Ophthalmology (Aug 2024)

Lens height paraments comparison according to ciliary sulcus width (CSW): a pilot study of the predictive role of CLR and STSL for vault after ICL implantation

  • Yingjie Ni,
  • Yuanpeng Wu,
  • Yi Dong,
  • Huihui Jin,
  • Kailei Zhang,
  • Chaoyang Hong,
  • Peijin Qiu,
  • Ting Shen

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03631-2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 24, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background To assess the relationship between postoperative implantable collamer lens (ICL) vault and lens height obtained from two different measurements. Methods A retrospective case series study enrolled eyes with horizontally implanted ICL. Crystal lens rise (CLR) and the distance between STS plane and anterior crystalline lens surface (STSL) were measured in the horizontal and vertical directions using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). We compared the differences in the parameters measured in both horizontal and vertical directions. The participants were categorized into three groups according to ciliary sulcus width (CSW) which is defined as the distance between the posterior angle of the iris and the anterior angle of the ciliary process: narrow CSW group (NSG); medium CSW group (MSG); and wide CSW group (WSG). The correlations between CLR/STSL and vault were examined in each of the three groups. Biased correlation analysis was used further to contrast the correlation between CLR/STSL and vault. Results This retrospective study included 223 myopic eyes. Vertical STSL (VSTSL) and vertical CLR (VCLR) exhibited significantly greater values compared to their horizontal counterparts (both P < 0.05). None of the indicators were statistically different between the three groups. In both NSG and MSG, STSL/CLR correlated with vault, while in WSG, only STSL correlated with vault (r=-0.316, P = 0.013). In contrast to HCLR, the correlation between HSTSL and vault remained after controlling for HCLR (r=-0.162, P = 0.015). Conclusions STSL should deserve more attention in the preoperative evaluation of ICL compared to CLR especially when CSW is large.

Keywords