Applied Sciences (Feb 2024)

Associations and Within-Group Differences in Physical Characteristics and Golf Performance Data in High-Level Amateur Players

  • Alex Brennan,
  • Andrew Murray,
  • Dan Coughlan,
  • Jack Wells,
  • Jiaqing Xu,
  • Anthony Turner,
  • Simon Brearley,
  • Chris Bishop

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14051854
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 5
p. 1854

Abstract

Read online

The aim of the present study was to assess the relationship between a comprehensive physical testing battery and golf performance, as quantified through a variety of previously determined usable metrics from launch monitor data. Twenty-six high-level, amateur golfers undertook a series of physical assessments, including anthropometry measurements, isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP), isometric bench press, countermovement jump (CMJ), seated medicine ball throws for distance, and seated thoracic rotation tests. In addition, golf shot data were recorded in an indoor biomechanics laboratory, with a driver and 6-iron to quantify clubhead speed (CHS), ball speed, carry distance, and smash factor. Pearson’s r associative analyses showed that the strongest relationships with the golf shot data were with the isometric bench press for the upper body (r values up to 0.76) and countermovement jump for the lower body (r values up to 0.82). In addition, the median split analysis of the physical performance data revealed that players who were able to exhibit greater maximal and explosive strength capabilities in the IMTP, isometric bench press, and CMJ assessments had a significantly greater CHS (g range = 1.09–1.28; p g range = 1.18–1.41; p g range = 1.06–1.53; p g range = 0.81–1.17; p < 0.05). These data underscore the importance of superior physical capacity for golfers, especially for maximal force production in both the lower and upper body, as well as explosive force production for the lower body.

Keywords