Bulletin of the National Research Centre (Sep 2024)

Anatomical parameters do not determine linear breaking strength or dimensions of the porcine biliary system

  • R. Catalina Ginghina,
  • Anne-Sophie Kronberg,
  • Jan Dauvergne,
  • Tobias Kratz,
  • David Katzer,
  • Rainer Ganschow,
  • Marit Bernhardt,
  • Sarah Westeppe,
  • Tim O. Vilz,
  • Benjamin Bierbach,
  • Christina Oetzmann von Sochaczewski

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-024-01249-4
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 48, no. 1
pp. 1 – 7

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background The porcine gall bladder and cystic duct gained attention in experimental research aimed at improving human clinical care. While the common bile duct has been investigated before, there is almost no data on the porcine cystic duct. Its relevance for research originates from its potential use in xenotransplantation. Methods We included 10 consecutive pigs (1♀, 9♂) that had been sacrificed after participation in another study. At necropsy, the distance from the biliary papilla to the gall bladder (gall bladder distance) was measured. The cystic duct was then subjected to linear traction. Ethical approval for the study was granted. Associations between force measurements and anatomical parameters were tested by correlation analysis. Results The pigs had a mean body weight of 21.9 kg (standard deviation 2 kg), a mean liver weight of 590 g (standard deviation 88 g), and a mean crown rump length of 67.3 cm (standard deviation 3 cm). The gall bladder distance was 8.2 cm (95% confidence interval: 7.6–8.7 cm). The cystic duct withstood mean linear traction forces of 4.8 N (95% confidence interval: 3.7–5.8 N) and could be elongated by a mean of 6 mm (95% confidence interval: 3.9–8 mm). Linear breaking strength was neither correlated to gall bladder distance (R = 0.3, 95% confidence interval: − 0.41 to 0.78, P = 0.406) or crown rump length (R = 0.42, 95% confidence interval: − 0.28 to 0.83, P = 0.222) nor liver weight (R = 0.02, 95% confidence interval: − 0.62 to 0.64, P = 0.954) or body weight (R = 0.36, 95% confidence interval: − 0.35 to 0.81, P = 0.304). This was also true for gall bladder distance. Conclusions Our study indicates that allometric parameters were not associated with the gall bladder distance or its resistance to traction forces. Consequently, substantial variation of these parameters can be expected in these surgically important parameters, which cannot be derived from easily accessible anatomical parameters.

Keywords