Journal of Translational Medicine (May 2020)

Differential responsiveness to BRAF inhibitors of melanoma cell lines BRAF V600E-mutated

  • Muna Al Hashmi,
  • Konduru S. Sastry,
  • Lee Silcock,
  • Lotfi Chouchane,
  • Valentina Mattei,
  • Nicola James,
  • Rebecca Mathew,
  • Davide Bedognetti,
  • Valeria De Giorgi,
  • Daniela Murtas,
  • Wei Liu,
  • Aouatef Chouchane,
  • Ramzi Temanni,
  • Barbara Seliger,
  • Ena Wang,
  • Francesco M. Marincola,
  • Sara Tomei

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02350-8
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background Most mutations in melanoma affect one critical amino acid on BRAF gene, resulting in the V600E substitution. Patient management is often based on the use of specific inhibitors targeting this mutation. Methods DNA and RNA mutation status was assessed in 15 melanoma cell lines by Sanger sequencing and RNA-seq. We tested the cell lines responsiveness to BRAF inhibitors (vemurafenib and PLX4720, BRAF-specific and sorafenib, BRAF non-specific). Cell proliferation was assessed by MTT colorimetric assay. BRAF V600E RNA expression was assessed by qPCR. Expression level of phosphorylated-ERK protein was assessed by Western Blotting as marker of BRAF activation. Results Three cell lines were discordant in the mutation detection (BRAF V600E at DNA level/Sanger sequencing and BRAF WT on RNA-seq). We initially postulated that those cell lines may express only the WT allele at the RNA level although mutated at the DNA level. A more careful analysis showed that they express low level of BRAF RNA and the expression may be in favor of the WT allele. We tested whether the discordant cell lines responded differently to BRAF-specific inhibitors. Their proliferation rate decreased after treatment with vemurafenib and PLX4720 but was not affected by sorafenib, suggesting a BRAF V600E biological behavior. Yet, responsiveness to the BRAF specific inhibitors was lower as compared to the control. Western Blot analysis revealed a decreased expression of p-ERK protein in the BRAF V600E control cell line and in the discordant cell lines upon treatment with BRAF-specific inhibitors. The discordant cell lines showed a lower responsiveness to BRAF inhibitors when compared to the BRAF V600E control cell line. The results obtained from the inhibition experiment and molecular analyses were also confirmed in three additional cell lines. Conclusion Cell lines carrying V600E mutation at the DNA level may respond differently to BRAF targeted treatment potentially due to a lower V600E RNA expression.

Keywords