Interdisciplinary Program in Translational Neuroscience, School of Interdisciplinary and Graduate Studies, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States; Department of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Louisville, United States; Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
Department of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Louisville, United States; Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
Interdisciplinary Program in Translational Neuroscience, School of Interdisciplinary and Graduate Studies, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States; Department of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Louisville, United States; Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
Morgan A Van Rijswijck
Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States; Speed School of Engineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
Rachel M Zalla
Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States; Speed School of Engineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
Darlene A Burke
Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
Johnny R Morehouse
Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
Amberley S Riegler
Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
Interdisciplinary Program in Translational Neuroscience, School of Interdisciplinary and Graduate Studies, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States; Department of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Louisville, United States; Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
Interdisciplinary Program in Translational Neuroscience, School of Interdisciplinary and Graduate Studies, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States; Department of Anatomical Sciences and Neurobiology, University of Louisville, Louisville, Louisville, United States; Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States; Speed School of Engineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, United States
Long ascending propriospinal neurons (LAPNs) are a subpopulation of spinal cord interneurons that directly connect the lumbar and cervical enlargements. Previously we showed, in uninjured animals, that conditionally silencing LAPNs disrupted left-right coordination of the hindlimbs and forelimbs in a context-dependent manner, demonstrating that LAPNs secure alternation of the fore- and hindlimb pairs during overground stepping. Given the ventrolateral location of LAPN axons in the spinal cord white matter, many likely remain intact following incomplete, contusive, thoracic spinal cord injury (SCI), suggesting a potential role in the recovery of stepping. Thus, we hypothesized that silencing LAPNs after SCI would disrupt recovered locomotion. Instead, we found that silencing spared LAPNs post-SCI improved locomotor function, including paw placement order and timing, and a decrease in the number of dorsal steps. Silencing also restored left-right hindlimb coordination and normalized spatiotemporal features of gait such as stance and swing time. However, hindlimb-forelimb coordination was not restored. These data indicate that the temporal information carried between the spinal enlargements by the spared LAPNs post-SCI is detrimental to recovered hindlimb locomotor function. These findings are an illustration of a post-SCI neuroanatomical-functional paradox and have implications for the development of neuronal- and axonal-protective therapeutic strategies and the clinical study/implementation of neuromodulation strategies.