Aquaculture Reports (Dec 2023)

Performance, processing yields, and fillet composition of specific United States diploid and triploid rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) lines reared in a semi-commercial scale freshwater recirculating aquaculture system

  • Curtis Crouse,
  • Anna Knight,
  • Travis May,
  • John Davidson,
  • Christopher Good

Journal volume & issue
Vol. 33
p. 101794

Abstract

Read online

Large rainbow trout marketed as steelhead are gaining considerable attention for production in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS). Diploid and triploid trout with varying genetics are available from several commercial suppliers; however, the performance and processing metrics of these lines have not been compared when raised in freshwater RAS. Current data on these outcomes could support more accurate cost and profitability estimates for potential RAS projects and optimize operation for existing farms. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to quantify performance metrics, processing yield, and fillet composition of six all-female rainbow trout lines (three diploid and three triploid) exposed to an artificial winter (12:12 light: dark at 40 g (Artificial Winter Photoperiod; AWP)) or continuous, 24-h light (No Winter Photoperiod; NWP) grown in a semi-commercial scale freshwater RAS to 3.5 kg. Overall, growth was impacted by line, ploidy, and artificial winter photoperiod. Diploid and AWP trout were smaller than triploids and NWP trout at stocking and 500 g. Mean diploid and triploid weight was similar at larger sizes (>1 kg); however, triploid performance compared to diploids varied by commercial supplier. Mortality was lower in lines from commercial supplier 1 than lines from commercial supplier 2 and the United States Department of Agriculture (14.4 ± 0.8 vs 27.5 ± 2.0 and 29.8 ± 4.3%, respectively). Head-on gutted and skin-on fillet yields were related with larger fish weight. Mature prevalence in diploids may have led to differences observed between diploids and triploids in fillet lipid (10.9 ± 0.8 vs 13.3 ± 0.6%) and moisture (67.0 ± 0.6 vs 65.1 ± 0.4%). The results provide guidance for rainbow trout RAS producers to make informed decisions on optimal harvest size targets and tailor their rainbow trout line or ploidy selection to those harvest sizes.

Keywords