European Radiology Experimental (Jan 2022)

Breast MRI in patients after breast conserving surgery with sentinel node procedure using a superparamagnetic tracer

  • Anke Christenhusz,
  • Joost J. Pouw,
  • Frank F. J. Simonis,
  • Michael Douek,
  • Muneer Ahmed,
  • Joost M. Klaase,
  • Anneriet E. Dassen,
  • Caroline A. H. Klazen,
  • Margreet C. van der Schaaf,
  • Bernard ten Haken,
  • Lejla Alic

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-021-00257-7
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 6, no. 1
pp. 1 – 9

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background A procedure for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using superparamagnetic iron-oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles and intraoperative sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection was developed to overcome drawbacks associated with the current standard-of-care SLNB. However, residual SPIO nanoparticles can result in void artefacts at follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. We present a grading protocol to quantitatively assess the severity of these artefacts and offer an option to minimise the impact of SPIO nanoparticles on diagnostic imaging. Methods Follow-up mammography and MRI of two patient groups after a magnetic SLNB were included in the study. They received a 2-mL subareolar dose of SPIO (high-dose, HD) or a 0.1-mL intratumoural dose of SPIO (low-dose, LD). Follow-up mammography and MRI after magnetic SLNB were acquired within 4 years after breast conserving surgery (BCS). Two radiologists with over 10-year experience in breast imaging assessed the images and analysed the void artefacts and their impact on diagnostic follow-up. Results A total of 19 patients were included (HD, n = 13; LD, n = 6). In the HD group, 9/13 patients displayed an artefact on T1-weighted images up to 3.6 years after the procedure, while no impact of the SPIO remnants was observed in the LD group. Conclusions SLNB using a 2-mL subareolar dose of magnetic tracer in patients undergoing BCS resulted in residual artefacts in the breast in the majority of patients, which may hamper follow-up MRI. This can be avoided by using a 0.1-mL intratumoural dose.

Keywords