Scientific Reports (Jun 2024)

A systematic review and bayesian meta-analysis of medical devices used in chronic pain management

  • Ashish Shetty,
  • Gayathri Delanerolle,
  • Chunli Deng,
  • Anish Thillainathan,
  • Heitor Cavalini,
  • Xiaojie Yang,
  • Yassine Bouchareb,
  • Amy Boyd,
  • Peter Phiri,
  • Jian Qing Shi,
  • Timothy Deer

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-63499-6
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
pp. 1 – 16

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Whilst. pharmacological therapies remain the cornerstone of pain management in chronic pain, factors including the current opioid epidemic have led to non-pharmacological techniques becoming a more attractive proposition. We explored the prevalence of medical device use and their treatment efficacy in non-cancer pain management. A systematic methodology was developed, peer reviewed and published in PROSPERO (CRD42021235384). Key words of medical device, pain management devices, chronic pain, lower back pain, back pain, leg pain and chronic pelvic pain using Science direct, PubMed, Web of Science, PROSPERO, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PorQuest and ClinicalTrials.gov. All clinical trials, epidemiology and mixed methods studies that reported the use of medical devices for non-cancer chronic pain management published between the 1st of January 1990 and the 30th of April 2022 were included. 13 studies were included in systematic review, of these 6 were used in the meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis for pain reduction showed that transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation combined with instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization treatment and pulsed electromagnetic therapy produced significant treatment on chronic lower back pain patients. Pooled evidence revealed the use of medical device related interventions resulted in 0.7 degree of pain reduction under a 0–10 scale. Significant improvement in disability scores, with a 7.44 degree reduction in disability level compared to a placebo using a 50 score range was also seen. Our analysis has shown that the optimal use of medical devices in a sustainable manner requires further research, needing larger cohort studies, greater gender parity, in a more diverse range of geographical locations.