Frontiers in Psychology (Aug 2023)

Predicting the dyadic coping through self-esteem among infertile couples undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: An actor-partner interdependence model

  • Lihong Zhang,
  • Wei Gu,
  • Xiaoyu Jing,
  • Shihan Zhi,
  • Nan Zhou,
  • Lu Zhang,
  • Wenru Wang,
  • Ying Jiang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1127464
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundThe population of infertile couples receiving in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in China is increasing gradually. The association of self-esteem and dyadic coping of infertile couples undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer has not been reported. This investigation aimed to examine the predictive effect of self-esteem of infertile couples undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer on coping strategies at the dyadic level.MethodsA cross-sectional study involving 283 infertile couples was conducted at the Reproductive Center of Northwest Women and Children’s Hospital in China. Participants were asked to complete two self-administered questionnaires, to assess self-esteem (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale) and dyadic coping (Dyadic Coping Inventory). Paired t-test and Pearson correlation were used to analyze the difference and correlation of variables between wife and husband. The actor-partner interdependence model was used to test the predictive effect of each individual’s self-esteem on their own and their partners’ dyadic coping.ResultsInfertile couples’ self-esteem and dyadic coping are in the medium range. The self-esteem of wives and husbands can fully predict their own dyadic coping. Meanwhile, the husband’s self-esteem can predict the wife’s stress communication (β = 0.135, p = 0.025), support dyadic coping (β = 0.142, p = 0.019), and negative dyadic coping (β = 0.133, p = 0.024), and the wife’s perceived partners’ supportive dyadic coping (β = 0.147, p = 0.014) and negative dyadic coping (β = 0.144, p = 0.016). Similarly, the wife’s self-esteem can predict the husband’s supportive dyadic coping (β = 0.195, p < 0.001), and the husband’s perceived partners’ stress communication (β = 0.184, p = 0.003) and supportive dyadic coping (β = 0.180, p = 0.002).ConclusionThe actor-partner analyses revealed insight into how infertile couples undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer interact and highlighted the importance of self-esteem in dyadic coping styles. Future psychological interventions can enhance self-esteem as an effective way to improve dyadic coping of infertile couples.

Keywords