The Astrophysical Journal (Jan 2023)

Supernova 2020wnt: An Atypical Superluminous Supernova with a Hidden Central Engine

  • Samaporn Tinyanont,
  • Stan E. Woosley,
  • Kirsty Taggart,
  • Ryan J. Foley,
  • Lin Yan,
  • Ragnhild Lunnan,
  • Kyle W. Davis,
  • Charles D. Kilpatrick,
  • Matthew R. Siebert,
  • Steve Schulze,
  • Chris Ashall,
  • Ting-Wan Chen,
  • Kishalay De,
  • Georgios Dimitriadis,
  • Dillon Z. Dong,
  • Christoffer Fremling,
  • Alexander Gagliano,
  • Saurabh W. Jha,
  • David O. Jones,
  • Mansi M. Kasliwal,
  • Hao-Yu Miao,
  • Yen-Chen Pan,
  • Daniel A. Perley,
  • Vikram Ravi,
  • César Rojas-Bravo,
  • Itai Sfaradi,
  • Jesper Sollerman,
  • Vanessa Alarcon,
  • Rodrigo Angulo,
  • Karoli E. Clever,
  • Payton Crawford,
  • Cirilla Couch,
  • Srujan Dandu,
  • Atirath Dhara,
  • Jessica Johnson,
  • Zhisen Lai,
  • Carli Smith

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acc6c3
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 951, no. 1
p. 34

Abstract

Read online

We present observations of a peculiar hydrogen- and helium-poor stripped-envelope (SE) supernova (SN) 2020wnt, primarily in the optical and near-infrared (near-IR). Its peak absolute bolometric magnitude of −20.9 mag ( L _bol, peak = (6.8 ± 0.3) × 10 ^43 erg s ^−1 ) and a rise time of 69 days are reminiscent of hydrogen-poor superluminous SNe (SLSNe I), luminous transients potentially powered by spinning-down magnetars. Before the main peak, there is a brief peak lasting <10 days post explosion, likely caused by interaction with circumstellar medium (CSM) ejected ∼years before the SN explosion. The optical spectra near peak lack a hot continuum and O ii absorptions, which are signs of heating from a central engine; they quantitatively resemble those of radioactivity-powered hydrogen/helium-poor Type Ic SESNe. At ∼1 yr after peak, nebular spectra reveal a blue pseudo-continuum and narrow O i recombination lines associated with magnetar heating. Radio observations rule out strong CSM interactions as the dominant energy source at +266 days post peak. Near-IR observations at +200–300 days reveal carbon monoxide and dust formation, which causes a dramatic optical light-curve dip. Pair-instability explosion models predict slow light curve and spectral features incompatible with observations. SN 2020wnt is best explained as a magnetar-powered core-collapse explosion of a 28 M _⊙ pre-SN star. The explosion kinetic energy is significantly larger than the magnetar energy at peak, effectively concealing the magnetar-heated inner ejecta until well after peak. SN 2020wnt falls into a continuum between normal SNe Ic and SLSNe I, and demonstrates that optical spectra at peak alone cannot rule out the presence of a central engine.

Keywords