Epigenetics & Chromatin (Oct 2019)

MeCP2-E1 isoform is a dynamically expressed, weakly DNA-bound protein with different protein and DNA interactions compared to MeCP2-E2

  • Alexia Martínez de Paz,
  • Leila Khajavi,
  • Hélène Martin,
  • Rafael Claveria-Gimeno,
  • Susanne Tom Dieck,
  • Manjinder S. Cheema,
  • Jose V. Sanchez-Mut,
  • Malgorzata M. Moksa,
  • Annaick Carles,
  • Nick I. Brodie,
  • Taimoor I. Sheikh,
  • Melissa E. Freeman,
  • Evgeniy V. Petrotchenko,
  • Christoph H. Borchers,
  • Erin M. Schuman,
  • Matthias Zytnicki,
  • Adrian Velazquez-Campoy,
  • Olga Abian,
  • Martin Hirst,
  • Manel Esteller,
  • John B. Vincent,
  • Cécile E. Malnou,
  • Juan Ausió

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13072-019-0298-1
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 1
pp. 1 – 16

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background MeCP2—a chromatin-binding protein associated with Rett syndrome—has two main isoforms, MeCP2-E1 and MeCP2-E2, differing in a few N-terminal amino acid residues. Previous studies have shown brain region-specific expression of these isoforms which, in addition to their different cellular localization and differential expression during brain development, suggest that they may also have non-overlapping molecular mechanisms. However, differential functions of MeCP2-E1 and E2 remain largely unexplored. Results Here, we show that the N-terminal domains (NTD) of MeCP2-E1 and E2 modulate the ability of the methyl-binding domain (MBD) to interact with DNA as well as influencing the turn-over rates, binding dynamics, response to neuronal depolarization, and circadian oscillations of the two isoforms. Our proteomics data indicate that both isoforms exhibit unique interacting protein partners. Moreover, genome-wide analysis using ChIP-seq provide evidence for a shared as well as a specific regulation of different sets of genes. Conclusions Our study supports the idea that Rett syndrome might arise from simultaneous impairment of cellular processes involving non-overlapping functions of MECP2 isoforms. For instance, MeCP2-E1 mutations might impact stimuli-dependent chromatin regulation, while MeCP2-E2 mutations could result in aberrant ribosomal expression. Overall, our findings provide insight into the functional complexity of MeCP2 by dissecting differential aspects of its two isoforms.

Keywords