The classification of feeding and eating disorders in the ICD-11: results of a field study comparing proposed ICD-11 guidelines with existing ICD-10 guidelines
Angélica M. Claudino,
Kathleen M. Pike,
Phillipa Hay,
Jared W. Keeley,
Spencer C. Evans,
Tahilia J. Rebello,
Rachel Bryant-Waugh,
Yunfei Dai,
Min Zhao,
Chihiro Matsumoto,
Cecile Rausch Herscovici,
Blanca Mellor-Marsá,
Anne-Claire Stona,
Cary S. Kogan,
Howard F. Andrews,
Palmiero Monteleone,
David Joseph Pilon,
Cornelia Thiels,
Pratap Sharan,
Samir Al-Adawi,
Geoffrey M. Reed
Affiliations
Angélica M. Claudino
Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Kathleen M. Pike
Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons
Phillipa Hay
Translational Health Research Institute (THRI), School of Medicine, Western Sydney University
Jared W. Keeley
Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University
Spencer C. Evans
Department of Psychology, Harvard University
Tahilia J. Rebello
Global Mental Health Program, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York State Psychiatric Institute, Mailman School of Public Health
Rachel Bryant-Waugh
Feeding and Eating Disorders Service, Department of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Population, Policy and Practice Programme, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health
Yunfei Dai
Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Min Zhao
Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Chihiro Matsumoto
National Study Coordinator for ICD-11 Field Studies, ICD-11 Committee, Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology
Cecile Rausch Herscovici
International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI, Argentina)
Blanca Mellor-Marsá
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro de Investigación en Red de Salud Mental
Anne-Claire Stona
Ministry for Solidarity and Health
Cary S. Kogan
School of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences
Howard F. Andrews
Departments of Biostatistics and Psychiatry and New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons
Palmiero Monteleone
Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”
David Joseph Pilon
Nova Scotia Health Authority, Dalhousie University
Cornelia Thiels
Department of Social Studies, University of Applied Sciences Bielefeld
Pratap Sharan
Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences
Samir Al-Adawi
Department of Behavioral Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University
Geoffrey M. Reed
Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization
Abstract Background The World Health Organization (WHO) International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) is used globally by 194 WHO member nations. It is used for assigning clinical diagnoses, providing the framework for reporting public health data, and to inform the organization and reimbursement of health services. Guided by overarching principles of increasing clinical utility and global applicability, the 11th revision of the ICD proposes major changes that incorporate empirical advances since the previous revision in 1992. To test recommended changes in the Mental, Behavioral, and Neurodevelopmental Disorders chapter, multiple vignette-based case-controlled field studies have been conducted which examine clinicians’ ability to accurately and consistently use the new guidelines and assess their overall clinical utility. This manuscript reports on the results from the study of the proposed ICD-11 guidelines for feeding and eating disorders (FEDs). Method Participants were 2288 mental health professionals registered with WHO’s Global Clinical Practice Network. The study was conducted in Chinese, English, French, Japanese, and Spanish. Clinicians were randomly assigned to apply either the ICD-11 or ICD-10 diagnostic guidelines for FEDs to a pair of case vignettes designed to test specific clinical questions. Clinicians selected the diagnosis they thought was correct for each vignette, evaluated the presence of each essential feature of the selected diagnosis, and the clinical utility of the diagnostic guidelines. Results The proposed ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines significantly improved accuracy for all FEDs tested relative to ICD-10 and attained higher clinical utility ratings; similar results were obtained across all five languages. The inclusion of binge eating disorder and avoidant-restrictive food intake disorder reduced the use of residual diagnoses. Areas needing further refinement were identified. Conclusions The proposed ICD-11 diagnostic guidelines consistently outperformed ICD-10 in distinguishing cases of eating disorders and showed global applicability and appropriate clinical utility. These results suggest that the proposed ICD-11 guidelines for FEDs will help increase accuracy of public health data, improve clinical diagnosis, and enhance health service organization and provision. This is the first time in the revision of the ICD that data from large-scale, empirical research examining proposed guidelines is completed in time to inform the final diagnostic guidelines.