BMC Primary Care (Aug 2022)

Introducing quality clusters in general practice – a qualitative study of the experiences of cluster coordinators

  • Marius Brostrøm Kousgaard,
  • Thorbjørn Hougaard Mikkelsen,
  • Maria Bundgaard,
  • Marie Henriette Madsen,
  • Morten Bonde Klausen,
  • Mads Toft Kristensen,
  • Pia Kürstein Kjellberg,
  • Jens Søndergaard

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01828-2
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 23, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Background In 2018, the concept of clusters was introduced as a new model for data-driven quality improvement in general practice in Denmark. However, there is little research on the development and implementation of general practice clusters. The study explores how the cluster coordinators responsible for leading the clusters forward enacted and experienced their role during the early years of the clusters with attention to the challenges and enablers perceived in the process. Methods Qualitative, semi-structured interviews with 25 cluster coordinators from clusters that had carried out at least two meetings on a specific professional topic. The coordinators represented clusters of varying sizes and different geographic locations. Key topics in the interview guide were the development and structure of the cluster, the role of the coordinator, obtainment of data for the meetings, the role of external support, the form and content of the meetings, the participation and engagement of the members. A thematic analysis – shaped by the original aims and categories of the study while also being open to emerging themes – was performed on the transcribed interview material. Results Important enablers in the process of developing the clusters included the positive engagement of the GPs, the support offered by regional quality units and a national quality organisation for general practice, and the funding provided by the formal cluster framework. Challenges initially included setting up the clusters administratively and translating the open cluster concept into a local, workable model; and later obtaining relevant data for the cluster meetings and facilitating peer discussions about the data. Conclusion The coordinators generally experienced that the development of the clusters had progressed relatively fast with engagement from most of the participating GPs. Still, challenges with data obtainment, data analysis, and facilitation will have to be addressed ongoingly. Future research should investigate learning processes at the cluster meetings and how the clusters impact clinical practice and collaborative relations between general practice and other health care providers.

Keywords