Comparison of Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization Versus Coil Embolization Alone for Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysms with Mild Symptoms: A Single-Clinic Experience

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the safety and efficacy of stent-assisted coil embolization (SAC) in acutely ruptured cerebral aneurysms without severe symptoms, and thus, the usefulness of the stent itself in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhages. Materials and Methods From January 2017 to June 2019, 118 patients were treated with coil embolization for acutely ruptured cerebral aneurysms without severe symptoms (Hunt & Hess grade ≤ 3). The periprocedural complications, six-month modified Rankin scores (mRS), and six-month radiologic outcomes were compared between 56 patients with SAC and 62 patients without SAC (non-SAC). Results The rate of good clinical outcomes (mRS ≤ 2), as well as the rate of hemorrhagic and ischemic complications, showed no significant difference between the SAC and non-SAC groups. Moreover, compared to the non-SAC group, the SAC group showed a lower recanalization rate on the six-month follow-up angiogram (20% vs. 39.3%, p = 0.001). Conclusion Although stent use was not significantly associated with clinical outcomes in coil embolization of ruptured cerebral aneurysms with non-severe symptoms (Hunt & Hess grade ≤ 3), it significantly decreased the rate of recanalization on follow-up cerebral angiograms.