Biomedicines (Oct 2023)

Traumatic Fracture Treatment: Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitute Case–Control Study in Humerus, Radius, Tibia Fractures—Assessing Efficacy and Recovery Outcomes

  • Gero Knapp,
  • Jonas Pawelke,
  • Christian Heiss,
  • Sera Elmas,
  • Vithusha Vinayahalingam,
  • Thaqif ElKhassawna

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11102862
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 11, no. 10
p. 2862

Abstract

Read online

To date, insufficient investigation has been carried out on the biocompatibility of synthetic bioactive bone substitute materials after traumatically induced bone fractures in clinical conditions. This study encompasses the safety, resorption, healing process, and complications of surgical treatment. Our current hypothesis posits that calcium phosphate-based bone substitutes could improve bone healing. In this retrospective case–control study, over 290 patients who underwent surgical treatment for acute fractures were examined. Bone defects were augmented with calcium phosphate-based bone substitute material (CP) in comparison to with empty defect treatment (ED) between 2011 and 2018. A novel scoring system for fracture healing was introduced to assess bone healing in up to six radiological follow-up examinations. Furthermore, demographic data, concomitant diseases, and complications were subjected to analysis. Data analysis disclosed significantly fewer postoperative complications in the CP group relative to the ED group (p p p = 0.01), and neurological diseases (p p > 0.05). Subgroup analysis focusing on patients aged 64 years and older revealed a diminished complication incidence within the CP group (p = 0.025). Notably, the application of CP bone substitute materials showed discernible benefits in geriatric patients, evident by decreased rates of pseudarthrosis (p = 0.059). Intermediate follow-up evaluations disclosed marked enhancements in fracture gap, edge, and articular surface conditions through the utilization of CP-based substitutes (p < 0.05). In conclusion, calcium phosphate-based bone substitute materials assert their clinical integrity by demonstrating safety in clinical applications. They substantiate an accelerated early osseous healing trajectory while concurrently decreasing the severity of complications within the bone substitute cohort. In vivo advantages were demonstrated for CP bone graft substitutes.

Keywords