European Papers (Jan 2017)

On the Content and Scope of National and European Solidarity Under Free Movement Rules: The Case of Golden Shares and Sovereign Investments

  • Daniele Gallo

DOI
https://doi.org/10.15166/2499-8249/107
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 2016 1, no. 3
pp. 823 – 845

Abstract

Read online

(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2016 1(3), 823-845 | Article | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - I.1. Structure and aims of the analysis. - I.2. Public services, strategic industries and socio-economic protectionism: solidarity within the EU and the scope of free movement rules vis-à-vis EU and non-EU investors. - II. Intra-EU investments and golden shares. - II.1. Public services, social regulation and European solidarity. - II.2. Golden shares, hybrid forms of socio-economic protectionism and freedom of movement: European market-oriented solidarity and economic regulation vs. national welfare-oriented solidarity and social regulation. - II.3. General (economic?) interest and the internal market: the scope of free movement justifications and the role of Art. 106, para. 2, TFEU within a "social market economy". - III. Non-EU investments, sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) and State owned enterprises (SOEs). - III.1. The capital/establishment dichotomy and the access of non-EU sovereign investors to the European internal market. - III.2. Domestic and EU responses for the restriction of non-EU sovereign investments and the possible convergence of national and European solidarity. - IV. Conclusion. | (Abstract) At the core of my article lies the tension between the EU's aims of market integration and the retention by national authorities of important powers in the carrying out of socio-economic activities. In this respect I have examined the concept of socio-economic protectionism under free movement rules in the context of the relationships between intra-EU golden shares, non-EU sovereign investments, SGEIs and strategic industries. To this end, I have argued that the multifaceted notion of solidarity, at national and EU levels, may serve for reaching a fair balance between the aims of economic/market regulation and those of social regulation.

Keywords