Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (Aug 2022)

Associations between polygenic risk of coronary artery disease and type 2 diabetes, lifestyle, and cardiovascular mortality: A prospective UK Biobank study

  • Jae-Seung Yun,
  • Jae-Seung Yun,
  • Sang-Hyuk Jung,
  • Sang-Hyuk Jung,
  • Sang-Hyuk Jung,
  • Manu Shivakumar,
  • Manu Shivakumar,
  • Manu Shivakumar,
  • Brenda Xiao,
  • Brenda Xiao,
  • Amit V. Khera,
  • Woong-Yang Park,
  • Hong-Hee Won,
  • Hong-Hee Won,
  • Dokyoon Kim,
  • Dokyoon Kim

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.919374
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 9

Abstract

Read online

BackgroundPrevious studies primarily targeted the ability of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) to predict a specific disease, and only a few studies have investigated the association between genetic risk scores and cardiovascular (CV) mortality. We assessed PRSs for coronary artery disease (CAD) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) as the predictive factors for CV mortality, independent of traditional risk factors, and further investigated the additive effect between lifestyle behavior and PRS on CV mortality.MethodsWe used genetic and phenotypic data from UK Biobank participants aged 40–69 years at baseline, collected with standardized procedures. Genome-wide PRSs were constructed using >6 million genetic variants. Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze the relationship between PRS and CV mortality with stratification by age, sex, disease status, and lifestyle behavior.ResultsOf 377,909 UK Biobank participants having European ancestry, 3,210 (0.8%) died due to CV disease during a median follow-up of 8.9 years. CV mortality risk was significantly associated with CAD PRS [low vs. very high genetic risk groups, CAD PRS hazard ratio (HR) 2.61 (2.02–3.36)] and T2DM PRS [HR 2.08 (1.58–2.73)], respectively. These relationships remained significant even after an adjustment for a comprehensive range of demographic and clinical factors. In the very high genetic risk group, adherence to an unfavorable lifestyle was further associated with a substantially increased risk of CV mortality [favorable vs. unfavorable lifestyle with very high genetic risk for CAD PRS, HR 8.31 (5.12–13.49); T2DM PRS, HR 5.84 (3.39–10.04)]. Across all genetic risk groups, 32.1% of CV mortality was attributable to lifestyle behavior [population attributable fraction (PAF) 32.1% (95% CI 28.8–35.3%)] and 14.1% was attributable to smoking [PAF 14.1% (95% CI 12.4–15.7%)]. There was no evidence of significant interaction between PRSs and age, sex, or lifestyle behavior in predicting the risk of CV mortality.ConclusionPRSs for CAD or T2DM and lifestyle behaviors are the independent predictive factors for future CV mortality in the white, middle-aged population. PRS-based risk assessment could be useful to identify the individuals who need intensive behavioral or therapeutic interventions to reduce the risk of CV mortality.

Keywords