Ecosphere (Aug 2023)

High‐resolution diving data collected from foraging area reveal that leatherback turtles dive faster to forage longer

  • Amy Migneault,
  • Ashley Bennison,
  • Thomas K. Doyle,
  • Michael C. James

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.4576
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 8
pp. n/a – n/a

Abstract

Read online

Abstract Despite multiple studies examining the diving behavior of leatherback sea turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) at coarse resolution over broad distances, there is still a paucity of high‐resolution diving data collected in areas where foraging has been confirmed. Short‐term (~1–3 h) deployments of suction cup tags with time–depth recorders (TDRs) on 10 free‐swimming leatherback turtles in a foraging area off Nova Scotia, Canada during August and September (2007–2014), captured a total of 161 dives. High‐resolution (1–5 s sampling rate) dive profile data indicated variability in diving behavior between and within individuals. On average, turtles spent 55.7% of their time diving and 44.3% at the surface. Turtles generally performed short (mean duration = 250.4 s [SD = 47.9 s]) and shallow dives (mean depth = 24.3 m [SD = 5.8 m]). We recorded a mean dive descent rate of 0.32 m/s, which is faster than values recorded for leatherbacks in tropical waters. This may reflect differences in environment, behavioral mode (e.g., foraging vs. inter‐nesting), and body condition. Linear mixed‐effects models suggest a significant positive correlation between descent rate and mean depth, maximum depth, and integrated vertical bottom movement (IVBM). Turtles with faster descent rates dove deeper and increased their predicted foraging behavior (IVBM, or the sum of absolute differences in depth changes while at the bottom portion of their dives). Models additionally showed that dive time, bottom time, and IVBM were all positively correlated to the post‐dive surfacing. This suggests that turtles required more time at the surface to recover and/or handle prey following longer dives characterized by increased vertical movement at the bottom portion of the dive. Dives were complex; the application of standard dive type/shape analysis may be over‐simplified and inappropriate for leatherbacks foraging in these habitats. These results portray a novel and detailed look at the foraging dynamics of a diving marine reptile.

Keywords