What is the Impact of Abnormal Amniotic Fluid Volumes on Perinatal Outcomes in Normal Compared with At-Risk Pregnancies?

Abstract

Pamela M Simmons, 1, 2 Julie R Whittington, 1 Sarah M Estrada, 3 Songthip T Ounpraseuth, 4 Kelsey B Shnaekel, 1 Kala B Slaton, 1 Everett F Magann 1 1University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Little Rock, AR, USA; 2Women’s Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baton Rouge, LA, USA; 3Madigan Army Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA, USA; 4University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Little Rock, AR, USACorrespondence: Everett F MagannUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4301 W. Markham St. Slot # 518, Little Rock, AR 72205-7199, USATel [phone]Fax [phone]Email [email protected]: Assessing amniotic fluid volume is an integral part of obstetric practice. Data are sparse on at-risk pregnancy and amniotic fluid volumes. The aim of our study was to determine if there is a difference in perinatal outcomes based on complications of pregnancy and amniotic fluid volumes. We hypothesized that at-risk pregnancies with abnormal amniotic fluid volumes would have worse perinatal outcomes than normal pregnancies with abnormal amniotic fluid volumes.Study Design: This retrospective cohort study evaluated both normal and at-risk singleton pregnancies with intact membranes on admission for delivery. Amniotic fluid volumes were estimated using both the amniotic fluid index (AFI) and single deepest pocket (SDP) techniques. All sonograms were performed by trained ultrasound technicians or obstetrician/gynecologists. We placed 3365 women into 6 separate groups (at-risk versus normal, then further stratified by oligohydramnios by SDP, normal fluid, or polyhydramnios by AFI).Results: At-risk pregnancies with normal fluid and at-risk pregnancies with polyhydramnios have significantly increased risk of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission [OR 2.06 (95% CI 1.63,2.60), OR 2.74 (95% CI 1.54, 4.87)]. Birthweight is significantly higher in at-risk and normal pregnancies with polyhydramnios than those with normal pregnancies and normal fluid (p< 0.0001). Birthweight is significantly lower in at-risk pregnancies with oligohydramnios (p< 0.0001). There were no significant differences in need for amnioinfusion in labor, variables or lates influencing delivery, meconium staining, or umbilical artery pH < 7.1.Conclusion: Our study attempted to further define risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes by defining the pregnancy as normal or at-risk and amniotic fluid volumes. Contrary to our hypothesis, we did not find an increased risk of many of the adverse perinatal outcomes we studied amongst at-risk pregnancies with abnormal fluid. There was an increased risk of NICU admission associated with polyhydramnios in normal and at-risk pregnancies.Keywords: amniotic fluid volume, obstetric ultrasound, neonatal outcomes, at-risk pregnancy

Keywords

• amniotic fluid volume
• obstetric ultrasound
• neonatal outcomes
• at-risk pregnancy