Current Urology (Jun 2024)

Proficiency score as a predictor of early trifecta achievement during the learning curve of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: Results of a multicentric series

  • Umberto Anceschi,
  • Rocco Simone Flammia,
  • Antonio Tufano,
  • Michele Morelli,
  • Antonio Galfano,
  • Lorenzo Giuseppe Luciani,
  • Leonardo Misuraca,
  • Paolo Dell’Oglio,
  • Gabriele Tuderti,
  • Aldo Brassetti,
  • Maria Consiglia Ferriero,
  • Alfredo Maria Bove,
  • Riccardo Mastroianni,
  • Francesco Prata,
  • Isabella Sperduti,
  • Giovanni Petralia,
  • Silvia Secco,
  • Ettore Di Trapani,
  • Daniele Mattevi,
  • Tommaso Cai,
  • Aldo Massimo Bocciardi,
  • Giuseppe Simone

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/CU9.0000000000000213
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 18, no. 2
pp. 110 – 114

Abstract

Read online

Abstract. Background. Recently, an innovative tool called “proficiency score” was introduced to assess the learning curve for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). However, the initial study only focused on patients with low-risk prostate cancer for whom pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) was not required. To address this issue, we aimed to validate proficiency scores of a contemporary multicenter cohort of patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with RARP plus extended PLND by trainee surgeons. Material and methods. Between 2010 and 2020, 4 Italian institutional prostate-cancer datasets were merged and queried for “RARP” and “high-risk prostate cancer.” High-risk prostate cancer was defined according to the most recent European Association of Urology guidelines as follows: prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/mL, International Society of Urological Pathology ≥4, and/or clinical stage (cT) ≥ 2c on preoperative imaging. The selected cohort (n = 144) included clinical cases performed by trainee surgeons (n = 4) after completing their RARP learning curve (50 procedures for low-risk prostate cancer). The outcome of interest, the proficiency score, was defined as the coexistence of all the following criteria: a comparable operation time to the interquartile range of the mentor surgeon at each center, absence of any significant perioperative complications Clavien-Dindo Grade 3–5, no perioperative blood transfusions, and negative surgical margins. A logistic binary regression model was built to identify the predictors of 1-year trifecta achievement in the trainee cohort. For all statistical analyses, a 2-sided p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results. A proficiency score was achieved in 42.3% patients. At univariable level, proficiency score was associated with 1-year trifecta achievement (odds ratio, 8.77; 95% confidence interval, 2.42–31.7; p = 0.001). After multivariable adjustments for age, nerve-sparing, and surgical technique, the proficiency score independently predicted 1-year trifecta achievement (odds ratio, 9.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.83–50.1; p = 0.007). Conclusions. Our findings support the use of proficiency scores in patients and require extended PLND in addition to RARP.