PLoS ONE (Jan 2019)

Gray-level discretization impacts reproducible MRI radiomics texture features.

  • Loïc Duron,
  • Daniel Balvay,
  • Saskia Vande Perre,
  • Afef Bouchouicha,
  • Julien Savatovsky,
  • Jean-Claude Sadik,
  • Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara,
  • Laure Fournier,
  • Augustin Lecler

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213459
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 3
p. e0213459

Abstract

Read online

ObjectivesTo assess the influence of gray-level discretization on inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of texture radiomics features on clinical MR images.Materials and methodsWe studied two independent MRI datasets of 74 lacrymal gland tumors and 30 breast lesions from two different centers. Two pairs of readers performed three two-dimensional delineations for each dataset. Texture features were extracted using two radiomics softwares (Pyradiomics and an in-house software). Reproducible features were selected using a combination of intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance and coherence coefficient (CCC) with 0.8 and 0.9 as thresholds, respectively. We tested six absolute and eight relative gray-level discretization methods and analyzed the distribution and highest number of reproducible features obtained for each discretization. We also analyzed the number of reproducible features extracted from computer simulated delineations representative of inter-observer variability.ResultsThe gray-level discretization method had a direct impact on texture feature reproducibility, independent of observers, software or method of delineation (simulated vs. human). The absolute discretization consistently provided statistically significantly more reproducible features than the relative discretization. Varying the bin number of relative discretization led to statistically significantly more variable results than varying the bin size of absolute discretization.ConclusionsWhen considering inter-observer reproducible results of MRI texture radiomics features, an absolute discretization should be favored to allow the extraction of the highest number of potential candidates for new imaging biomarkers. Whichever the chosen method, it should be systematically documented to allow replicability of results.