BMJ Open (Apr 2022)

Psychosocial interventions for community-dwelling individuals with schizophrenia: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Hissei Imai,
  • Aran Tajika,
  • Naoki Yoshinaga,
  • Hiroki Tanoue,
  • Yasushi Ishida,
  • Hideki Nakamura,
  • Yoshifumi Kido,
  • Yuki Shikuri,
  • Fumitake Yamaguchi,
  • Taichi Goto,
  • Hirotake Sawada

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057286
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 4

Abstract

Read online

Introduction Despite the recent global mental health movement of the transition from hospital-centred to integrated community-based services, comprehensive evidence of psychosocial interventions focusing on community-dwelling individuals with schizophrenia is still lacking. To overcome this gap in the current knowledge, we will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of all types of psychosocial interventions for community-dwelling (non-hospitalised) individuals with schizophrenia when compared with non-active control conditions (eg, treatment as usual).Methods and analysis This study protocol has been developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. By March 2022, the following sources will have been searched, without restrictions for language or publication period: Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. We will also try to identify other potentially eligible studies by searching the reference lists of included studies, other relevant systematic reviews and grey literature. All relevant randomised controlled trials from both high-income and low-income to middle-income countries will be allowed. Two independent reviewers will conduct the selection/screening of studies, data extraction and methodological quality assessment of included studies. The primary outcomes are quality of life and psychiatric hospital admission. Standard pairwise meta-analyses with a random-effects model will be conducted. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to assess the robustness of the findings. Risk of bias will be assessed with the Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for Randomised Trials. The Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will be used to assess the quality of evidence.Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required for this study. The study findings will be disseminated through conference presentations as well as peer-reviewed publications.PROSPERO registration number CRD42021266187.