Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (Nov 2021)

Association Between 2D- and 3D-Speckle-Tracking Longitudinal Strain and Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Evidence of Diffuse Myocardial Fibrosis in Heart Transplant Recipients

  • Wei Sun,
  • Wei Sun,
  • Wei Sun,
  • Xuehua Shen,
  • Xuehua Shen,
  • Jing Wang,
  • Shuangshuang Zhu,
  • Shuangshuang Zhu,
  • Shuangshuang Zhu,
  • Yanting Zhang,
  • Yanting Zhang,
  • Yanting Zhang,
  • Chun Wu,
  • Chun Wu,
  • Chun Wu,
  • Yuji Xie,
  • Yuji Xie,
  • Yuji Xie,
  • Yun Yang,
  • Yun Yang,
  • Yun Yang,
  • Nianguo Dong,
  • Guohua Wang,
  • Yuman Li,
  • Yuman Li,
  • Yuman Li,
  • Qing Lv,
  • Qing Lv,
  • Qing Lv,
  • Bo Liang,
  • Li Zhang,
  • Li Zhang,
  • Li Zhang,
  • Mingxing Xie,
  • Mingxing Xie,
  • Mingxing Xie

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.727745
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 8

Abstract

Read online

Objective: This study aimed to: (1) evaluate the association between myocardial fibrosis (MF) quantified by extracellular volume fraction (ECV) and myocardial strain measured by two-dimensional (2D)- and three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography (3D-STE) and (2) further investigate which strain parameter measured by 2D- and 3D-STE is the more robust predictor of MF in heart transplant (HT) recipients.Methods: A total of 40 patients with HT and 20 healthy controls were prospectively enrolled. Left ventricular (LV)-global longitudinal strain (GLS), global circumferential strain (GCS), and global radial strain (GRS) were measured by 2D- and 3D-STE. LV diffuse MF was defined by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)-ECV.Results: The HT recipients had a significantly higher native T1 and ECV than healthy controls (1043.8 ± 34.0 vs. 999.7 ± 19.7 ms, p < 0.001; 26.6 ± 2.7 vs. 24.3 ± 1.8%, p = 0.02). The 3D- and 2D-STE-LVGLS and LVGCS were lower (p < 0.005) in the HT recipients than in healthy controls. ECV showed a moderate correlation with 2D-LVGLS (r = 0.53, p = 0.002) and 3D-LVGLS (r = 0.60, p < 0.001), but it was not correlated with 2D or 3D-LVGCS, or LVGRS. Furthermore, 3D-LVGLS and 2D-LVGLS had a similar correlation with CMR-ECV (r = 0.60 vs. 0.53, p = 0.670). A separate stepwise multivariate linear analysis showed that both the 2D-LVGLS (β = 0.39, p = 0.019) and 3D-LVGLS (β = 0.54, p < 0.001) were independently associated with CMR-ECV.Conclusion: CMR marker of diffuse MF was present in asymptomatic patients with HT and appeared to be associated with decreased myocardial strain by echocardiography. Both the 2D- and 3D-LVGLS were independently correlated with diffuse LVMF, which may provide an alternative non-invasive tool for monitoring the development of adverse fibrotic remodeling during the follow-up of HT recipients.

Keywords