Microorganisms (Jul 2024)

Microbial Electrolysis Cells Based on a Bacterial Anode Encapsulated with a Dialysis Bag Including Graphite Particles

  • Irina Amar Dubrovin,
  • Lea Ouaknin Hirsch,
  • Abhishiktha Chiliveru,
  • Avinash Jukanti,
  • Shmuel Rozenfeld,
  • Alex Schechter,
  • Rivka Cahan

DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12071486
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 12, no. 7
p. 1486

Abstract

Read online

One of the main barriers to MEC applicability is the bacterial anode. Usually, the bacterial anode contains non-exoelectrogenic bacteria that act as a physical barrier by settling on the anode surface and displacing the exoelectrogenic microorganisms. Those non-exoelectrogens can also compete with exoelectrogenic microorganisms for nutrients and reduce hydrogen production. In this study, the bacterial anode was encapsulated by a dialysis bag including suspended graphite particles to improve current transfer from the bacteria to the anode material. An anode encapsulated in a dialysis bag without graphite particles, and a bare anode, were used as controls. The MEC with the graphite-dialysis-bag anode was fed with artificial wastewater, leading to a current density, hydrogen production rate, and areal capacitance of 2.73 A·m−2, 134.13 F·m−2, and 7.6 × 10−2 m3·m−3·d−1, respectively. These were highest when compared to the MECs based on the dialysis-bag anode and bare anode (1.73 and 0.33 A·m−2, 82.50 and 13.75 F·m−2, 4.2 × 10−2 and 5.2 × 10−3 m3·m−3·d−1, respectively). The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of the modified graphite-dialysis-bag anode showed the lowest charge transfer resistance of 35 Ω. The COD removal results on the 25th day were higher when the MEC based on the graphite-dialysis-bag anode was fed with Geobacter medium (53%) than when it was fed with artificial wastewater (40%). The coulombic efficiency of the MEC based on the graphite-dialysis-bag anode was 12% when was fed with Geobacter medium and 15% when was fed with artificial wastewater.

Keywords