Scientific Reports (Oct 2024)

Evaluation of whole genome sequencing utility in identifying driver alterations in cancer genome

  • Takeshi Nagashima,
  • Ken Yamaguchi,
  • Kenichi Urakami,
  • Yuji Shimoda,
  • Sumiko Ohnami,
  • Keiichi Ohshima,
  • Tomoe Tanabe,
  • Akane Naruoka,
  • Fukumi Kamada,
  • Masakuni Serizawa,
  • Keiichi Hatakeyama,
  • Shumpei Ohnami,
  • Koji Maruyama,
  • Tohru Mochizuki,
  • Maki Mizuguchi,
  • Akio Shiomi,
  • Yasuhisa Ohde,
  • Etsuro Bando,
  • Teiichi Sugiura,
  • Takashi Mukaigawa,
  • Seiichiro Nishimura,
  • Yasuyuki Hirashima,
  • Koichi Mitsuya,
  • Shusuke Yoshikawa,
  • Yoshio Kiyohara,
  • Yasuhiro Tsubosa,
  • Hirohisa Katagiri,
  • Masashi Niwakawa,
  • Kaoru Takahashi,
  • Hiroya Kashiwagi,
  • Yoshichika Yasunaga,
  • Yuji Ishida,
  • Takashi Sugino,
  • Hirotsugu Kenmotsu,
  • Masanori Terashima,
  • Mitsuru Takahashi,
  • Katsuhiko Uesaka,
  • Yasuto Akiyama

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-74272-0
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 14, no. 1
pp. 1 – 10

Abstract

Read online

Abstract In cancer genome analysis, identifying pathogenic alterations and assessing their effects on oncogenic processes is important. Although whole exome sequencing (WES) can effectively detect such changes, driver alterations could not be identified in 27.8% of the cases, according to a previous study. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the utility of whole genome sequencing (WGS) and clarify its differences with WES in terms of driver alteration detection. For this purpose, WGS analysis was conducted on 177 driverless WES samples, selected from 5,480 fresh frozen samples derived from 5,140 Japanese patients with cancer. These samples were selected as primary tumor, both WES and transcriptome profiling were performed, estimated tumor content of ≥ 30%, and no driver alterations were identified by WES. WGS identified driver and likely driver alterations in 68.4 and 22.6% of the samples, respectively. The most frequent alteration type was oncogene amplification, followed by tumor suppressor gene deletion and small variants located outside the coding region. In the remaining 9.0% of samples, no such signals were identified; therefore, further investigations are required. The current study clearly demonstrated the role and utility of WGS in identifying genomic alterations that contribute to tumorigenesis.

Keywords