Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine (May 2024)

Impact of Pulmonary Ventilation Dysfunction on Prognosis of Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Single-Center, Observational Study

  • Yu-Shan Li,
  • Qiang Ren,
  • Jian Zhang,
  • Yan-Chun Liang,
  • Ya-Ling Han,
  • Quan-Yu Zhang

DOI
https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2506197
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 25, no. 6
p. 197

Abstract

Read online

Background: Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) often experience pulmonary ventilation dysfunction following their initial event. However, there is insufficient research exploring the relationship between this dysfunction and CAD prognosis. Methods: To address this gap, a retrospective observational study was conducted involving 3800 CAD patients without prior pulmonary ventilation disease who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) during hospitalization between November 2015 and September 2021. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), such as death, myocardial infarction (MI), repeat revascularization, and stroke. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize selection bias between the two groups, with a subgroup analysis stratified by smoking status. Results: The results showed that patients were divided into normal (n = 2159) and abnormal (n = 1641) groups based on their pulmonary ventilation function detected by CPET, with 1469 smokers and 2331 non-smokers. The median follow-up duration was 1237 (25–75% interquartile range 695–1596) days. The primary endpoint occurred in 390 patients (10.26%). 1472 patients in each of the two groups were enrolled in the current analysis after PSM, respectively. However, pulmonary function was not associated with MACE before (hazard ratio (HR) 1.20, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.99–1.47; Log-rank p = 0.069) or after PSM (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.86–1.34; Log-rank p = 0.545) among the entire population. Nonetheless, pulmonary ventilation dysfunction was significantly associated with an increased risk of MACE in smoking patients (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.25–2.18; p < 0.001) but not in non-smoking patients (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.60–1.09; p = 0.159). In addition, there was a significant interaction between current smoking status and pulmonary ventilation dysfunction on MACE (p for interaction < 0.001). Conclusions: Pulmonary ventilation dysfunction identified through CPET was independently associated with long-term poor prognosis in smoking patients with CAD but not in the overall population.

Keywords