CATHETER II: a randomised controlled trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of various washout policies versus no washout policy in preventing catheter-associated complications in adults living with long-term catheters
John Norrie,
Graeme Maclennan,
David Cooper,
Paul Little,
Peter Murchie,
Phyo Kyaw Myint,
Mohamed Abdel-fattah,
Mary Kilonzo,
Muhammad Imran Omar,
Diana Johnson,
Sara J Maclennan,
James N'Dow,
Graham Scotland,
Amanda Young,
Seonaidh Cotton,
James Larcombe,
Nikesh Thiruchelvam,
Catherine Paterson,
Lynda Constable,
Hashim Hashim,
Sheela Tripathee,
Konstantinos Dimitropoulos,
Suzanne Evans,
Karen Powell
Affiliations
John Norrie
Centre for Public Health, Queen`s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
Graeme Maclennan
Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
David Cooper
Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Paul Little
Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Peter Murchie
Academic Primary Care Research Group, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Phyo Kyaw Myint
Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Mohamed Abdel-fattah
Aberdeen Centre for Women’s Health Research, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Mary Kilonzo
Health Economics Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Muhammad Imran Omar
Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Diana Johnson
Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Sara J Maclennan
Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
James N'Dow
Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Graham Scotland
Health Economics Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Amanda Young
Queen`s Nursing Institute, London, UK
Seonaidh Cotton
Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
James Larcombe
NHS Durham Dales Easington and Sedgefield CCG, Sedgefield, UK
Nikesh Thiruchelvam
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
Catherine Paterson
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Public Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
Lynda Constable
Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Hashim Hashim
Bristol Urological Institute, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
Sheela Tripathee
Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
Konstantinos Dimitropoulos
Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
Objectives Do weekly prophylactic saline or acidic catheter washouts in addition to standard long-term catheter (LTC) care improve the outcomes of adults with LTC compared with standard LTC care only.Design Three-arm superiority open-label randomised controlled trial.Setting UK community-based study.Participants 80 adults with LTC (any type/route) ≥28 days in situ with no plans to discontinue and able to self-manage the washouts/study documentation with/without a carer.Interventions Randomly allocated (26:27:27) to receive standard LTC care with weekly saline or weekly acidic or no prophylactic washouts for up to 24 months.Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary outcome was catheter blockage requiring intervention (per 1000 catheter days). Secondary outcomes were symptomatic catheter-associated urinary tract infection (S-CAUTI) requiring antibiotics, adverse events, participants’ quality of life and day-to-day activities, acceptability and adherence.Results Outcomes reported for 25 saline, 27 acidic and 26 control participants. LTC blockages (per 1000 catheter days) requiring treatment were 9.96, 10.53 and 20.92 in the saline, acidic and control groups, respectively. The incident rate ratio (IRR) favours the washout groups (saline 0.65 (97.5% CI 0.24 to 1.77); p=0.33 and acidic 0.59 (97.5% CI 0.22 to 1.63); p=0.25), although not statistically significant. The S-CAUTI rate (per 1000 catheter days) was 3.71, 6.72 and 8.05 in the saline, acidic and control groups, respectively. The IRR favours the saline group (saline 0.40 (97.5% CI 0.20 to 0.80); p=0.003 and acidic 0.98 (97.5% CI 0.54 to 1.78); p=0.93). The trial closed before reaching target recruitment due to reduced research capacity during the COVID-19 pandemic.Conclusions Early closure and small sample size limits our ability to provide a definite answer. However, the observed non-statistically significant differences over control are favourable for lower rates of LTC blockages without a concomitant rise in S-CAUTI. The results support a multinational randomised controlled trial of catheter washouts in patients with LTC to ascertain their clinical and cost-effectiveness.Trial registration number ISRCTN17116445.