On the road again: A study valuing wildlife crossings for wetland mitigation on State Road 40 in Volusia County, Florida

Abstract

Abstract Over the past few decades, wildlife crossings have effectively reduced wildlife–vehicle collisions and improved habitat connectivity and genetic exchange for animals. However, wildlife crossings are expensive to construct, and the cost may discourage transportation agencies from implementing new wildlife crossings on public roadways. Additionally, transportation agencies and planners rarely consider the permitting and mitigation costs that wildlife crossings can require. A road profile must be raised to accommodate a wildlife underpass on many Florida roadways, particularly in low‐lying areas. Raising the road can result in new wetland impacts that would not occur but for the wildlife crossing. Consequently, new or more compensatory wetland mitigation may be required to satisfy § 404 of the Clean Water Act—a cost to the transportation agency and taxpayers. We used Florida's Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM) to calculate the value of functions in habitats before and after planned wildlife crossings on State Road 40 in Volusia County, Florida. The results of our analysis show that wildlife crossings will enhance the functions in remnant habitats adjacent to the wildlife crossings, generating wetland mitigation credits that reduced the amount of compensatory wetland mitigation required by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Our case study provides a novel application of the UMAM in valuing wildlife crossings. We believe the UMAM can be used in cost–benefit models and transportation planning to determine the functional value of new wildlife crossings, thereby producing a monetary value that can incentivize new wildlife crossing projects.

Keywords

• compensatory mitigation § 404 permitting
• road ecology
• Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method
• wildlife crossings